Rumor: Surface 3 May Arrive In October

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • TechyInAZ
    I love the surface series, but the only way I would ever get an RT version is if Microsoft allowed the ability to install ARM desktop apps natively (not by jail breaking).
    Reply
  • waethorn
    If this is true at all (very doubtful), the only plausible delay reason is probably that Azure RemoteApp wasn't ready yet.
    Reply
  • jeremymcdev
    I would like to see the surface series go the Atom route. You get x86 at the same cost plus you can keep it light and power efficient like the RT version.
    Reply
  • jeremymcdev
    The non pro surface series that is.
    Reply
  • Bloob
    While my surface is great for a lot that I do with it, I do miss some great desktop apps on it, especially with the store still being somewhat anemic. Microsofts own solutions for music and video, for example, fall short of what I expect of modern media players.
    Reply
  • falchard
    I would like Microsoft go the AMD route for Surface. You get the correct power envelope for a tablet with the power to actually do stuff.
    Reply
  • red77star
    I tried Surface and that thing is just unusable. Usability fails on both fronts...touch and mouse.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    This is late because Tekra K1 was late. Nvidia Shield tablet was released just a few days ago.
    But I allso would prefer to see atom or AMD APU based windows tablets from Microsoft. They could run all normal windows aplication and allso Modern UI aplications. The Windows tablet is at this moment the ultimate hybrid tablet platform. In pure tablet environment, the competition is quite fierce and MS still has some steps to do until it is at the same level and Android and Apple. It is getting nearer and nearer with each update, but the best reason to use windows tablet has been hybrid usage (tablet/notebook), so why not use that as an standing point?
    Reply
  • hannibal
    @ red77star I have also used Surface tablet (surface pro) and I have found it very good machine! It has it weakness, but as an hybrid it is an its own level at this moment!
    You can use office programs with good keyboard, play normal steam games and still have the portability of tablet.
    Reply
  • RedJaron
    13830560 said:
    I would like Microsoft go the AMD route for Surface. You get the correct power envelope for a tablet with the power to actually do stuff.
    And just how would they do that? AMD doesn't make an ARM chip yet, and the first ones to come out won't have any graphics support so you'd have to add in some kind of GPU chip which makes them more expensive and complicated.

    If you're talking x86, you're saying a 15W is too high a power envelope for a laptop/tablet hybrid device? The i3 actually goes down to 11.5W. If you want to move to a Temash chip, you drop from 1600 to 1066 RAM, lose 1 MB cache, and top out at 1.4GHz ( compared to 1.5GHz, 2.9GHz, and 3.3GHz. )
    Reply