RTX 5050 could use the same 20 Gbps GDDR6 VRAM as the RX 9070 XT and RTX 4070 — Nvidia's budget card to leverage fastest GDDR6 possible
It's not GDDR7, but it is the fastest mass-produced GDDR6 variant money can buy.

The RTX 5050 has already been tipped to feature GDDR6 memory rather than GDDR7 found in the RTX 5060 through RTX 5090. However, what was still unknown was the speed bin Nvidia would choose. Leaker MEGAsizeGPU on X reports that the RTX 5050 will allegedly utilize the fastest version of GDDR6 in mass production — 20 Gbps modules, which are used in AMD's RX 9070 series GPUs and Nvidia's GDDR6 variant of the RTX 4070.
If the X leak is accurate, the RTX 5050 will feature 320GB/s of memory bandwidth, 40% of the bandwidth of the RTX 5060 (which boasts 448GB/s of memory bandwidth). The massive drop-off in memory bandwidth goes hand in hand with the RTX 5050's 50% drop in CUDA cores from the RTX 5060. It remains to be seen what the RTX 5050 would be capable of with GDDR7, but it is likely the GPU's significantly cut-down compute power will prevent the 20 Gbps GDDR6 modules from being a major bottleneck.
By the way, Desktop RTX5050 uses 20Gbps GDDR6, the same as the RDNA4 family. https://t.co/Va2Qj7ZRIeJune 13, 2025
The 20 Gbps speed bin is the fastest version of GDDR6 used by any GPU currently. This latest variant is nearly as fast as Micron's 21 Gbps GDDR6X memory modules used in Nvidia's RTX 30 series and RTX 40 series. Micron's G6X is just 5% quicker than the aforementioned GDDR6 counterpart. Technically, Samsung has developed 24 Gbps GDDR6 memory modules, but those are not in mass production (and may never be).
At least for the Samsung version, the main advantage of GDDR6 is its power consumption; Samsung's 20 GBps GDDR6 requires just 1.1V to operate. By contrast, older versions of GDDR6 and Micron's GDDR6X memory require 1.35V (or 23% more voltage) to function. Though strangely, SK hynix's does not have any GDDR6 variants with a voltage rating below 1.35V, suggesting its 20 Gbps counterpart runs at 1.35V.
One interesting side effect the RTX 5050 might have to endure is a potential 1-2% performance deviation depending on which models get Samsung modules and which ones get SK Hynix modules. The RX 9070 XT allegedly boasts a 1-2% performance delta based on which manufacturer its GDDR6 modules come from, with the SK Hynix-equipped models running 1-2% faster than their Samsung counterparts.
The disparity in performance allegedly comes from looser timings on the Samsung modules; it is likely that Samsung prioritized power efficiency with its 20 Gbps variants, resulting in slightly lower performance but significantly less power draw than SK Hynix's counterpart (as we mentioned already).
The RTX 5050's specs have all but been confirmed, featuring 2,560 CUDA cores, 20 SMs, and a 128-bit memory interface based on the GB207 die. The only part of the RTX 5050's specs that has been absolutely confirmed is the fact that it will be using GDDR6 memory of some kind (even though the RTX 5050 laptop GPU uses GDDR7). Other leaks suggest the RTX 5050 will run at a peak boost clock of 2,520MHz. A release date has not been leaked or confirmed by Nvidia, but the RTX 5050 (desktop version) will likely launch sometime this year.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.
-
bit_user
"Leverage?" What about "harness", "feature", or just simply "utilize"? It's bad style to use jargon, word when an ordinary word will work just as well or better.The headline said:Nvidia's budget card to leverage fastest GDDR6 possible
I don't mind "leverage" being used, when it's appropriate. However, the name implies some sort of analogy with a lever, in which case you'd expect to see a nonlinear benefit being derived, as a result. DRAM speeds tend to have a weakly sub-linear relation to performance. Sometimes linear, but almost never super-linear. Therefore, I wouldn't describe any sort of non-exotic memory choice as something being "leveraged".
If it's not something we'll ever see, does it really remain to be seen? I'd use a turn of phrase like "We can only wonder".The article said:It remains to be seen what the RTX 5050 would be capable of with GDDR7 -
Notton Isn't there a faster GDDR6X that does 21Gbps? I recall that being a thing with the RTX 4070 GDDR6 vs GDDR6XReply
Not that I expect Nvidia to go for the expensive option for a scum tier card. -
usertests
We can only harness the heartstrings of teh words.bit_user said:If it's not something we'll ever see, does it really remain to be seen? I'd use a turn of phrase like "We can only wonder".
As for the 5050's performance, if it has 2560 cores as widely leaked, then I don't see it matching the RTX 4060 with 3072 cores (+20%). But it can be a decent bit faster than the RTX 3050 8GB which also has 2560 cores, but on the older Ampere architecture.
The only way the 5050 makes a splash is with a low price. Which could mean $200... even $220 in this market. A 75W SFF version would also be appreciated. -
bit_user
GDDR6X is a non-standard and Micron-exclusive. That means it's more expensive, because you're locked into a single supplier, giving you no bargaining power or alternative supply, if they decide to shift more production over to GDDR7 or HBM4.Notton said:Isn't there a faster GDDR6X that does 21Gbps?
Also, the way it reaches higher speeds is by using PAM4, which probably burns more power than running GDDR6 at 20 Gbps.
BTW, the highest-clocked implementation of GDDR6X was the RTX 4080, which ran it at 23 Gbps.