MPEG Issues Draft For More Efficient Video Compression

The new High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) draft describes a technology that achieves about twice the compression levels of the current H.264/AVC standard.

“There’s a lot of industry interest in this because it means you can halve the bit rate and still achieve the same visual quality, or double the number of television channels with the same bandwidth, which will have an enormous impact on the industry,” said Ericsson's Per Fröjdh, chairman of the Swedish MPEG delegation. According to the manager, HEVC could be launched as early as 2013. “It will take time before it’s launched for a TV service, but adoption is much quicker in the mobile area, and we’ll probably see the first services for mobile use cases next year,” he said. Fröjdh stated that his group is also working on a naked-eye 3D video compression format for introduction in 2014.

An introduction of a new video compression format is always problematic and superior technology not always translates in market adoption. For example, there have been several attempts to replace the JPEG image format with formats such as JPEG2000 back in the 2000 time frame and, more recently, there has been an effort from Microsoft to make HD Photo (Windows Media Photo) available as a JPEG replacement that can reach quality levels of uncompressed TIFF images.

In the video arena, H.264 has been discussed because of its patent base that could expose adoption of the format to licensing fees, which prompted, for example, Google to pitch its own VP8-based WebM format. And, of course, there is still OGG/OGV, which is also looking to gain some traction. Despite Google's huge effort to drive WebM into the market, H.264 remains the preferred video format today and it showcases just how tough it is to replace what has been established as a standard in the market.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

  • nikorr
    Also, the new H.265 standard, is ready for publication in early 2013.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    What is that blocking the left side of my TV?
    Reply
  • myromance123
    That's pretty cool!
    Reply
  • jdog2pt0
    "or double the number of television channels with the same bandwidth"

    Why D: There's already so many channels and nothing to watch! Quality over quantity please.
    Reply
  • doorspawn
    A near-halving of bytes for the same quality would be immense, similar to halving fuel consumption.
    Considering people have been researching video compression for many decades, I'm betting the "same quality" is really "a little bit worse".

    Basically, I'll believe it when I see it. Especially as they go on to say they're working on glasses-free 3D compression.

    Regardless, I totally agree that business is far too able to prevent transitioning to better tech like their example of jpeg vs jpeg2000.
    Reply
  • dcay
    NikorrAlso, the new H.265 standard, is ready for publication in early 2013.
    High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is the new H.265.
    Reply
  • annymmo
    Also the new standard will cost a lot of money to license.
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    annymmoAlso the new standard will cost a lot of money to license.
    The hardest part is transitioning into it. Standards take a very long time, like USB3 or Copperpeak (Thunderbolt).
    Reply
  • torque79
    .... we keep getting more bandwidth available. can we please stop compressing everything to hell? Video compression and hidef audio (to less people) are the only reasons blu-ray is still important to those who care about quality.
    Reply
  • _SirO_
    Storque79.... we keep getting more bandwidth available. can we please stop compressing everything to hell? Video compression and hidef audio (to less people) are the only reasons blu-ray is still important to those who care about quality.
    Sure we can, as long you don't mind waiting for 10 hours to download a 1080p video, or you like your HD live TV @ 5fps
    Reply