AMD Radeon HD 7990 Benchmarks Leaked

Some benchmarks ran on the HD 7990 have surfaced on WCCF Tech, and it appears that not only do they make the HD 7990 the king of the hill, it crushes the competition.

The benchmarks were run against the GTX 690 as well as the GTX Titan. Previously we already informed you of the final specifications of the HD 7990, and now we're showing you what those specifications actually churn out in synthetic benchmarks and a game.

For starters we've got the 3DMark numbers:

Furthermore, Hardware.info has also shown some numbers concerning the performance in Battlefield 3:

Stay tuned for more!

Niels Broekhuijsen

Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.

  • lostmyclan
    this i say "muscle card"
    Reply
  • icraft
    I wish I could afford it. They need to go back to having 7870x2 type boards, for people with 1 PCI-e slot and not enough money for this beast.
    Reply
  • slomo4sho
    Now only if the price is more reasonable then the suggested $1000
    Reply
  • balister
    The titan came in at 40.3 FPS and the 690 came in at 53.3 FPS.
    Reply
  • slomo4sho
    10703368 said:
    The titan came in at 40.3 FPS and the 690 came in at 53.3 FPS.


    Don't worry, he mixed up the 3DMark benchmarks for the 690 and Titan as well. Niels has a hard time deciphering graphs.
    Reply
  • UVB076
    Watch out guys, they benchmarked a Radeon HD7970 crossfire setup! NEVER. BEEN. DONE. BEFORE.
    Reply
  • soundping
    The force is strong with this video card.
    Reply
  • unknown9122
    If only this consumes less power than the 690 and costs less. Now that is one hill to climb. I think the delay was beneficial and gave AMD time to fine tune the card.
    Reply
  • schnitter
    If this costs $700-$800 and it fits in a BitFenix prodigy, I will buy it. The only way I'd pay $1000 at this point is if it was next gen, as in DirectX 12.
    Reply
  • mousseng
    102% scaling sounds too good to be true, if you ask me.
    Reply