Best offers
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Caviar Black 1TB Hard Drive (Serial... | $99.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
X25-M Gen2 160GB 2.5" Solid State... | $509.95 PC Connection More info |
|
My Passport Essential Portable 320GB... | $134.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
Perfect Consumer Backup With Seagate And Rebit
Seagate’s Replica is a portable hard drive with automatic backup, versioning, and disaster recovery features to make backup a no-brainer. The product works so well that it deserves our rare Best of Tom’s Award. Read More
-
Picking A Hard Drive For Your NAS: New Green Beats Old Speed
When it comes to mechanical hard drive performance, 7,200 RPM drives are considered the fastest. But does that convention apply in a NAS environment as well? We compare network storage performance with a handful of Samsung's "green" drives to see. Read More
-
Thecus N8800 NAS/SAN: Quick-Look
After recently running out of room on my Thecus N5200, I again turned to the company for something larger. What I found won't work for most folks (unless you have a rack in your garage, that is). But it's reasonably-priced and plenty fast for most SMBs. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Sponsored links
Insane Storage: Store 10 TB in a Quarter
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (29) |
- Share
A breakthrough in storage technology by researchers brings capability of packing the contents of roughly 250 DVDs onto a disk the size of a quarter.
The new storage technique involves ‘self-assembly’ properties of chemically dissimilar polymer chains to array themselves into extremely dense, yet perfectly regular formations within cell sizes as small as three nanometers according to Ting Xu of the University of California at Berkeley and co-lead investigator Thomas Russell of UMass Amherst.
In theory, three-nanometer domains could create a storage density of 10 terabytes per square inch. When compared to the record 803 gigabytes per square inch achieved in rarified testing of perpendicular magnetic recording at TDK’s labs, the new technique beats that by nearly 12.5 times over.
Xu and Russell’s nanoscale arrays may also prove to be useful in circuit design as the self-assembling-polymer method has the advantage of not relying on typical photolithography technology that is commonly used for circuit design now.
Quoting Ting Xu :
“The challenge with photolithography is that it is rapidly approaching the resolution limits of light. In our approach, we shifted away from this ‘top down’ method of producing smaller features and instead utilized advantages of a ‘bottom up’ approach.”
Xu has also mentioned that their technique is more environmentally friendly than photolithography since it does not depend on harsh chemicals and acids. However, this new approach to extreme storage densities is not doing us any good sitting in a lab, but according to Xu, “The beauty of the method we developed is that it takes from processes already in use in the industry, so it will be very easy to incorporate into the production lines with little cost.”
If you are interested in reading a far more in-depth explanation of this new storage technology, the University of California has papers available here.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
- 64 Bit processors means huge memory cap [CPU & Components]
- Performance after your hard drive reaches 50% capacity [Laptops & Notebooks]
- HELP!!! I NEED TO UPGRADE MY PC... THINKING OF BUILDING ONE... [Homebuilt Systems]
- Project: 'Monster' Gaming Rig by CustomPCMAX [CPU & Components]
- Non-binary computing breakthrough [CPU & Components]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Part II - The q6600 Strikes Back, of "I'd like some expertise please..
- WD Raptor 150GB Not A Good Value!!
- AMD Quad FX Vs Core 2 Extreme QX 6700 Benchmarks
- When can we expect ____ ??
- The future of computers...
- Fastest & quietest Hard Drive for the OS
- u320 vs. SATA
- MEMORY FAQ (please read before posting)
- Hard Drives Not Needed
- 64-bit or 32-bit: When will it matter?
- Thinking about going Raptor - Will 10k help me?
- ANOUNCEMENT: zsplit, unzsplit: free linux tools to make a ..
- HD advice please...
- HardDrive recommendation?
Oooo. That's shiny, can't wait for this technology to show up in retail products a few years from now.
Hook it up! A thumb drive would allow you to carry all the data you could want (for not at least) and boot multiple OSes directly from there and store all your data with you wherever you go! Just plug in a USB/eSATA port and away you go! Weeeeeee!
It seems like there are new storage technologies coming out everyday. Can't they just pick one and run with it? ;-)
Hook it up! A thumb drive would allow you to carry all the data you could want (for not at least) and boot multiple OSes directly from there and store all your data with you wherever you go! Just plug in a USB/eSATA port and away you go! Weeeeeee!
I meant for "now" at least....
well you know businesses they try to make everything smaller and hold more data at the same time
How do you recall data stored at 3nm? We are talking wavelengths well-below ultra-violet to get that kinda resolution. It took them how long just to create HD-DVD and BluRay? Probably not going to see this technology in even a decade.
Just imagine that guy's pr0n stash now
If it's so easy to "incorporate into production lines" then why can't they have this technology deployed by the end of the year?
It seems like there are new storage technologies coming out everyday. Can't they just pick one and run with it? ;-)
now that you mention it.. all those manufacturers switched to making ssd disks and now they come up with this.. and if it proves to be as easy to make as they say, then this is probably the future of storage. we shall see, we shall see
I remember reading about these techniques 2 years ago... what have they done to improve utilizing it?
I've read about technologies like this 6 years ago. None of them have come to fruition.
You know, it almost made me cry, the way he described how his new idea will save the world from harsh chemicals and acids. In other news, all harsh environment destroying chemicals have neutralizers and are not wontonly thrown out the kitchen window or down the drain. It just happens to sound like the person is such a great steward of the environment. In reality he is nothing more than a peice of shit media slut.
... I was going to give you a thumbs up until you got all militant and started name calling
Hmm...
Let's say this will be relatively cheap to produce and sell, and will be available in < 5 years to consumers (yes, consumers), how are the people/companies involved going to screw this one up? Let's not forget the media industries: R*AA and M*AA. How are they going to wreck it so that it won't be available to consumers (do you think they'll allow you to have a big "pirate chest" to store all of the things you "stole"; to them everyone is pirate, remember?)?
Anyone remember Fluorescent Multilayer Disc? Yep, they had a storage media that easily scales to Terabytes and rewritable to begin with (as opposed to traditional optical media w/c are readonly first, then made rewritable); not to mention very scratch-resistant. What happened? On one of their demo, it was revealed that they weren't using their tech (instead using, I think, a harddrive) for playback. It was a scandal. Did it mean the tech didn't work? No. But they faced financial problems due to it, still. Where is the tech now? On market, though NOT on consumer market. Such a waste of tech; out of reach of the consumer.
*Sigh*
Still not the storage density of a strand of DNA. Which can both store and compute but hopefully it is not 25 yrs out either.
Now if they could talk about the 10TBs of storage FOR a quarter.
How is the data read? it seems pretty impossible for a physical medium, but they didn't mention anything about a cool solid state reader. If this tech is:
1) Low power
2) Cheap in R&D left
3) Easily and continuously re-writable
4) Easily and continuously re-readable
5) Not fucked up during launch
Then it seems pretty epic. Would like to track future progress.
A dual-layer DVD is about 8GB. 10TB could hold about 1250 DVDs, not 250. Western Digital's 2TB drive could handle 250 DVDs without additional compression.
The article writer is correct when he states this does us no good if it's just sitting in a lab. Give us an actual product.
Only 10 years to burn 1 disc.
A dual-layer DVD is about 8GB. 10TB could hold about 1250 DVDs, not 250. Western Digital's 2TB drive could handle 250 DVDs without additional compression.
A dual layer dvd is 8.5GB. Still their math is a little off.
A storage medium as clean and efficient as the Japanese; nice. I wish it would come out within 10 years but if past harddrive progress is any indication, 15 to 20 years is more likely.
Completely impossible to see this working in the next couple years. The data retrieval would be impossible with current (or even future) technology on hand.
3TB on the size of an SD card seems nice!
Completely impossible to see this working in the next couple years. The data retrieval would be impossible with current (or even future) technology on hand.
If they have no way of retreiving the information currently, what proof is there that this is actually working now?
It will save the environment. So it is good.
If they have no way of retreiving the information currently, what proof is there that this is actually working now?
I mean it working in anywhere but a lab setting where everything is setup perfectly and in a totally controlled setting. What do you think all the random variables that are in the real world are going to do to the data and the way it is retrieved? What about all the random interferance we all are subjected to each day?
I am not saying it is never possible, it just isn't going to happen as soon as you may think.
So how fast can it run?
250 DVDs onto a disk the size of a quarter not 1250 DVD's on a 10TB drive!