The Ultrabook is praised as the savior for the PC industry in 2012, and is the flagship product for the launch of Windows 8.
However, market researchers believe that Ultrabooks will fall short of their opportunity, largely due to the fact that prices remain high and marketing has failed to create interest in the category.
IHS now expects only 10.3 million Ultrabooks will be shipped in 2012, down from a previous forecast of 22 million units. The 2013 forecast was also cut from 61 million to 44 million units. To succeed, IHS said that Ultrabooks need to become available in the $600 price range and drop down from their current lofty $1,000 neighborhood. For 2013, the market research firm says that a $600 touchscreen Ultrabook with Windows 8 will be a requirement. If prices remain high, sales "will continue to struggle".
“With the economy languishing, ultrabook sellers may have trouble finding buyers at the current pricing, especially with fierce competition from new mobile computing gadgets such as the iPhone 5, Kindle Fire HD and forthcoming Microsoft Surface,” said Craig Stice, senior principal analyst for compute platforms at IHS.
While there has been consistent news from Intel as well as system vendors that prices will come down, Ultrabook retail prices are relatively stable at around $1,000 today. What we are seeing is a blame game, in which one side accuses the other of greed and a complaint of lack of innovation goes in the other - while the industry is attempting to maintain a positive tone prior to the launch of Windows 8. However, there is mounting criticism that is zeroing on marketing as well as Intel's tight grip on the Ultrabook definition.
"Another factor causing IHS to reduce the forecast is Intel’s increasingly stringent set of definitions for ultrabooks," the market research firm said. "Based on these designations, many notebooks once called ultrabooks now are being classified as ultrathins."
On the vendor side, IHS argues that there is simply no differentiation among Ultrabooks, which is met by a lack of marketing that has not created interest in the category among consumers. The firm went as far as describing current marketing campaigns as "nebulous".
“So far, the PC industry has failed to create the kind of buzz and excitement among consumers that is required to propel ultrabooks into the mainstream," Stice said. "This is especially a problem amid all the hype surrounding media tablets and smartphones. When combined with other factors, including prohibitively high pricing, this means that ultrabook sales will not meet expectations in 2012."
Still, IHS believes the opportunity is there. The firm projects 95 million Ultrabooks to be sold in 2016.
Really? Someone is going to decide to buy an iPhone 5 to write their research paper, or create those spreadsheets vital to the marketing department at work?
Toshiba / Intel laptop. $349
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834214599
3rd Gen iPad 16GB $510
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16858753079
-or-
Cheapest ASUS ultrabook $780
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834230466
That's the lowest price ultrabook model available. If they can make a 15" laptop and sell it for $350-$1000, then how come a 13" laptop costs $800-$2000?
You can snag one for $600 AUSD (Which is pretty good).
Not sure why Ultrabooks are a better choice over laptops though..
Scored a 15" Acer/w i7 3610QM, GT640M and 4GB of RAM for $1000.
A comparable ultrabook for that price is more like a 3rd gen i5/w HD4000 graphics and 4GB of RAM with a bad screen.
It's not the size of the screen that's affecting the price so much, it's the solid state hard drives they have (which is why they're so thin). The technology is still pretty nascent, and they have tiny capacity compared with traditional hard-disks.
As for Thunderbolt, I dont think Intel is making it that expensive. Intel has several variants and one of which is fairly inexpensive. The problem is when the entire system goes for $1k, adding a $30 adapter that has very few available products out for it is probably not a great selling point. Apple creates an entire echosystem so they can do Thunderbolt. The PC world is shared amongst each other though and 1 system costing even a few dollars more than another for some Thunderbolt interface few people believe they need is not a strong selling point. $$$ isn't the entire problem. Intel needs to convince companies to build more Thunderbolt devices an make it an exciting option so vendors can differentiate their products by offering Thunderbolt.
Until netbooks, the highly-portable end of the laptop market was always higher priced for fewer features. I tend to carry a lot of gear in my bag (camera, 2 lenses, flash, laptop, accessories) so I've usually paid the premium for the ultralight. It hasn't been cheap. And no, Apple did not invent the category with the Air. My past laptops have included:
http://www.lenzg.net/portege3440CT/
http://www.links.net/re/equip/laptop/thinkpad/560.html (4 lbs was featherweight back then)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_ThinkPad_Butterfly_keyboard
So ultrabook pricing is not at all surprising. The people who need/want the extra portability are willing to pay for it. Most of those retailed for over $3000 when they first came out, vs. about $1500-$2000 for the regular 6-8 lb laptop.
The problem with ultrabooks is that generally people don't require them--they're nice-to-have items, but not really a mass-market computer. Anyone who expected them to do well--I mean, compose any significant number of computer shipments--probably didn't understand the market in the first place. They're excellent for mobile people who will pay a premium for that mobility without taking a hit on specs. Otherwise, they're not appealing in any way.
Here's a thinker--despite poor spec's, people jumped on netbooks when initially released. Why? Because they mostly satisfied most users requirements for a mobile computer, and didn't cost a lot of money. Who is buying laptops, generally? Corporations--and they don't want to pay a premium over standard laptops. And students--who also don't want to pay a premium over standard laptops. I'm not saying they don't have their use, but they're still not a mass-market item. Of course they wouldn't compose a majority of computer shipments.
I can't speak for the general public, however, I and those I know will not be purchasing an Ultrabook. No, we're waiting for the Trinity Ultrathins.
yes the competition for an ultrabook is a phone, an e-reader and an unreleased convertible.
even though i agree with the fact that prices are too high to be effective, IHS (and Wolfgang's articles) always lose my respect because of statements like these.
The few out there already are not of interest, like Acers with the stupid motor driven hatch in the back that hides the port. Thunderbolt could bring an unprecedented flexibility ans scalability to mobile computing. Without this, ultrabook is just a lame attempt that has no postion in the market place.