Google is killing the web with AI Overviews – I made an extension to block them

block Google AI Overviews
(Image credit: Future)

Let’s be honest about it. The web isn’t what it used to be, and Google is the culprit — or at least one of them. The company has decided to push AI overviews and AI mode onto search users, regardless of the damage it causes to the user experience or the harm it may inflict on publishers and the entire open web.

The company recently announced that it’s pushing AI Overviews, which appear above the organic search results, to even more countries and queries. These overviews are often comically wrong. For example, when I asked Google on Friday “Is today Friday,” it said:

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Avram Piltch
Managing Editor: Special Projects

Avram Piltch is Managing Editor: Special Projects. When he's not playing with the latest gadgets at work or putting on VR helmets at trade shows, you'll find him rooting his phone, taking apart his PC, or coding plugins. With his technical knowledge and passion for testing, Avram developed many real-world benchmarks, including our laptop battery test.

  • Kindaian
    A couple of years ago, Google decided in their infinite wisdom, that it was a good idea to just index what they deemed relevant.

    So, that marked the death of the internet as we knew it.

    Now we have only visibility to the pages that the advertisers (Google is just one of them now) deem profitable.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Or you can just use another search engine, like Bing or DuckDuckGo...Nobody is forcing you to use Google and their broken and/or unhelpful Gemini AI. Continuing to send them traffic with this extension or other means gives them no reason to change, but reducing their traffic, however, does.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Or you can just use another search engine, like Bing or DuckDuckGo...Nobody is forcing you to use Google and their broken and/or unhelpful Gemini AI. Continuing to send them traffic with this extension or other means gives them no reason to change, but reducing their traffic, however, does.
    Advertisers and businesses in general advertise with Google because they are the dominant search platform.
    You are effectively forced to use Google if you are a business due to that being the most efficient use of your advertising dollars.
    Google has just enough competitors to point at to say they aren't a monopoly.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Or you can just use another search engine, like Bing or DuckDuckGo...Nobody is forcing you to use Google and their broken and/or unhelpful Gemini AI. Continuing to send them traffic with this extension or other means gives them no reason to change, but reducing their traffic, however, does.
    Every person I personally know has switched to a non Chromium browser and alternate search due largely in response to my advocation as they complained to me about privacy and search results. There's still AI slop, but it's not as much in their faces. This will get worse and may never get better.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    derekullo said:
    Advertisers and businesses in general advertise with Google because they are the dominant search platform.
    You are effectively forced to use Google if you are a business due to that being the most efficient use of your advertising dollars.
    Google has just enough competitors to point at to say they aren't a monopoly.
    Well, you just defined a monopoly, and on that note....

    Last year:

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/google-loses-dojs-big-monopoly-trial-over-search-business/
    and more recently:

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/04/google-loses-ad-tech-monopoly-trial-faces-additional-breakups/
    And also:

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/06/google-settles-shareholder-lawsuit-will-spend-500m-on-being-less-evil/
    TL: DR Google has a monopoly.
    Reply
  • Mindstab Thrull
    Thanks to Avram for putting in time to make something that's useful to us. Yes, there's other options, but that's a bit like saying "I made a chocolate cake, do you want some?" and pointing out there's a pastry shop nearby where you could get Black Forest cake - or apple pie if that's your thing. I'll certainly give Avram's extension a try.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    When I manually ask AI a question, I get an AI generated answer to the question I asked.

    When I search without asking AI, the top 10,000 results are blogs that used an older AI to generate answers to questions different than the question I asked.

    AI isn't causing the web to be flooded with useless, lazy, SEO-breaking slop. The Google AI implementation is sortof bad and a completely unsustainable business model due to it's extremely high compute cost - but its still currently a major step up from Google search being an unusable waste of time.
    It's a temporary, kludgy solution to Google firing all the people who knew how to keep their search algorithm functioning properly. Google has to constantly update their algorithm to stay ahead of humanity's bottomless pool of endless spam. The extremely talented (and profitable) engineers who knew how to do that are not the people who "returned to office", and the very best and brightest of them were independently wealthy enough to just retire at the start of Covid.

    Google is starting to crack under its own weight and is showing weakness. The first company to make a counter-AI that can effectively cut through the noise and serve its customers quality, human generated content (not just web search but on Youtube, etc) is going to make all the money.
    Not " a lot of money", but all the money. In the world.
    It's not going to be an AI designed to generate fresh answers to old questions a trillion times a day - It's going to be one trained to recognize lazy/worthless slop, and automatically block it... which is basically what Google's Search should have been trying to do in the first place.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Or you can just use another search engine, like Bing or DuckDuckGo...Nobody is forcing you to use Google and their broken and/or unhelpful Gemini AI. Continuing to send them traffic with this extension or other means gives them no reason to change, but reducing their traffic, however, does.

    Fun fact: DuckDuckGo is just an implementation of Bing.
    So is MSN (duh), Yahoo, AOL, Brave, Ask Jeeves, Ecosia, Lycosa, Search.com, and probably anything else that anybody can think of.

    I'm not sure that switching to Bing is a good choice for people annoyed with AI, considering how desperate Microsoft is to forcibly insert Copilot into everybody's throat.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Or you can just use another search engine, like Bing or DuckDuckGo...Nobody is forcing you to use Google and their broken and/or unhelpful Gemini AI. Continuing to send them traffic with this extension or other means gives them no reason to change, but reducing their traffic, however, does.
    Bing is only slightly better, as it's run by a different monopoly called Microsoft.

    I switched to startpage many years ago. If nothing else, they do clicks on searches right, by opening a new tab with the URL instead of losing your search results. (Like google and duckduckgo.)

    It's unfortunate that google has become so well known that people naturally say "google it". They are a bit too established.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    Search "Does Costco to alignments?" Google AI says Yes.
    Search "Costco alignment" and Google AI says No, the service is not offered.

    The worst part of this is that the search results will try to reinforce what the AI barfed out. It'll go dig up content from 10 years ago to support its answer. Search winds up promoting a lot of irrelevant or obsolete content when it didn't used to do so. A search engine that contradicts itself is not useful to me. Google buries search results under too much garbage too. Bing is better these days, but not by much.

    I'm looking for a good replacement search engine. I feel like search peaked about 10-15 years ago and has been sliding downhill ever since.
    Reply