Samsung, HTC Attempt iPhone 5 Ban Using LTE Patents

64

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Tuan Mai is a Los Angeles based writer and marketing manager working within the PC Hardware industry. He has written for Tom's Guide since 2010, with a special interest in the weird and quirky.
  • bustapr
    I doubt anyone is surprised about this. Im all for the fall of apple, but I really do hate patent wars.

    just how many frikin patents are involved with LTE tech?!
    Reply
  • Thisbymaster
    *Dr. Evil* Mhahaahahahah I will hold their phones for ransom for one 100 billion dollars.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    We want competition! This petty patent war means that customers can not buy those phones they like most. It does not matter who manufactures them... All in all all this mean that new phones are more expensive. Even due legal costs or because there is no competition, because other player is out of the game due banning. We can not buy Samsung phones and now not even iPhones... Is there any law out there that says that this is illegal?

    *sigh*
    Reply
  • memadmax
    Might as well just pass a couple of suitcases full of money back and forth....
    Reply
  • Dark Lord of Tech
    Go Samsung!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply
  • I'm doubtful that HTC and Samsung will go ahead with a lawsuit against iPhone's LTE functionality. For one, US carriers won't like it - any ban on the new phone will adversely affect their bottom line. The US carriers have very little to gain from any injunction - in fact, Verizon, AT&T and Sprint all came out against Apple's injunction against Samsung last year filing amicus briefs.
    Reply
  • Richeemxx
    This is what I hate about these patent fights and the way things are setup.

    First I'm not big on the system as a whole. But I don't think companies should be able to use "standards" and FRAND patents as a means of extortion and that is what I get out of this.

    Second I hate that any company, Apple included, can piggy back off of those said patents and amass a huge market share a a fortune off said patents before anything can be done. A prime example is them using Motorola, Samsung, HTC ect patents to build their device, bring it to market and then say hey we aren't paying royalties.

    Now saying that, at least in the case of Motorola it sounded like they tried to reach terms under a FRAND agreement. But they didn't like those terms. In the case here it sounds like they are blatantly ripping off the other companies by not even trying to license the tech under FRAND terms. That to me should be grounds in and of itself for an injunction.
    Reply
  • techcurious
    ahhh.. reading this just made my day! :)
    Reply
  • joebob2000
    bustaprI doubt anyone is surprised about this. Im all for the fall of apple, but I really do hate patent wars. just how many frikin patents are involved with LTE tech?!
    Apple has 434 and Samsung has 819. HTC probably has a few hundred, and the other players may have a few hundred as well. Let's round it off and say there are probably close to 2,000 patents related to LTE.
    Reply
  • bllue
    I hope Apple loses. Hard.
    Reply