U.S. Government Approves Landmark Digital Privacy Bill

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • robertking82881
    nothing stoping them for doing it any way . and theres gonna be a loophole or one made. or they will hire some one off the record to look in to some one to get a warrant on . the law go's beyond the law all the time
    Reply
  • huggles12
    robertking82881nothing stoping them for doing it any way . and theres gonna be a loophole or one made. or they will hire some one off the record to look in to some one to get a warrant on . the law go's beyond the law all the time
    Even if that is true, at least we know there are people in the Government who respect and are willing to enforce the privacy of others.

    The alternative could be much worse.
    Reply
  • chewy1963
    I like that this passed, however, I don't like that they " Instead, it has been applied to a proposed amendment to the Video Privacy Protection Act which will head to the Senate for voting next year." That needs to be stopped as well.

    I also don't like that police can serve a warrant to your ISP and make the ISP delay for almost a year before they can notify you. What kind of BS is that? If your information is being looked at under a warrant, you should be able to know that immediately!
    Reply
  • Marcus52
    I don't think it is "natural" that law enforcement groups would argue against stronger privacy laws; I think the real American law enforcement officer embraces protecting the rights of individuals in our country.

    I think the educated lawman understands "checks and balances" and why we need them. I think he can easily enough see that not all his fellow officers are honest, pure of heart, or completely unbiased, and that Americans might not have a common religion but they do hold some things sacred, and protecting the individual from wrongful judgment is one of those things.

    These laws don't prevent law enforcement from accessing any documents - they prevent them from doing it in a closed system without an overseer. We need overseers, we need judges to approve putting aside a citizen's rights, to do it knowing there is strong reason to believe such an extreme action is justified.
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    In theory, if law enforcement was fair, i wouldnt mind them knowing everthing about me. The thing is, they are corrupt.
    Because of this, there are laws that defend me from them, therefore defeating the entire purpouse of "LAW ENFORCEMENT".
    But as we all know, those rich and in positions of power tend to have an esier time than regular folk when dealing with authorities, so its probably just a way to limit others while not limiting themselves.

    In this case, i like the idea, however we shall see how long it actually lasts.
    Reply
  • slicedtoad
    It nice to hear good news for once, even a small amount.
    Reply
  • drbaltazar
    NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW,YES NOT EVEN THE LAW ITSELF!this system was created and have worked for centuries.it is for the good of us all.need a specific global info that intail wider scope?then military judge should see the case if warrent is needed .the case is too big even the military judge cant decide?then un court justice judge should give the warrent!i dont believe there could be a case where no judge of higher instance isnt avail!
    Reply
  • drbaltazar
    it doesnt stop the law!it just force the justice to make sense,they cant just go on fishing trip ,and if they do they are accountable.they still have 90 days of secrecy,this means:they got a warrant in september ?they ve been fishing for data for the last 3 month!mmmmmme i think this is too long!why?take a truck driver .we need to keep our record for the last 30 days in the truck!so it should be the same for this you get 30 days of secrecy,pending review from a judge if you need more!a lot of stuff !happen in a season!
    Reply
  • robertking82881nothing stoping them for doing it any way . and theres gonna be a loophole or one made. or they will hire some one off the record to look in to some one to get a warrant on . the law go's beyond the law all the timei will still buy into a VPN and go even further than that for my privacy, there is more than just the government out there to ruin your life over a stupid download, or an out of context message, etc.. RIAA is just one example.

    its safe to assume that you are on your own to raise your own shield of privacy, no one will provide one for you. undermining is a 2 way street, you have your own barricade and those that try to undermine you have their own. assume the worst, prepare for the worst
    Reply
  • kellybean
    Really, more lies. Everyone in US under virtual surveillance' - NSA whistleblower.
    http://rt.com/usa/news/surveillance-spying-e-mail-citizens-178/
    Reply