Trending

Why Google Built the Nexus Q in the USA

By

Cost wasn't the number one priority.

Since its unveiling last week at Google I/O, Google's Nexus Q media streaming device has attracted quite a bit of attention thanks to the fact that the device is made in America. At a time when the vast majority of our electronics are manufactured in Asia, the Nexus Q's 'Made in the U.S.A.' branding is a very rare thing indeed. So what made Google decide to build its latest device in its own backyard?

For Google, it was all about speed. Speaking to Reuters, the company said they wanted to see how fast the product could go from concept to finished product, and a Chinese manufacturer would have lengthened the process. John Lagerling, Google's senior director of Android global partnerships, told Reuters that cost wasn't the number one priority.

"We wanted to innovate fast. This is the first end-to-end hardware product that Google has ever put out," he said, adding that Google wanted to see if it could do fast design iterations rather than flying engineers across the world. "This is not this big initiative that things had to be made in the USA," he said.

Google's Nexus Q will launch next month priced at $300. However, Google hasn't yet discussed the manufacturing bill of materials (MBOM), so we don't yet know how much of an impact its American assembly has had on the overall price.

Follow @JaneMcEntegart on Twitter.                      

Topics
Android
Google
32 Comments Comment from the forums
  • captaincharisma 05 July 2012 23:14
    because they knew it was going to fail
    Reply
  • beardguy 05 July 2012 23:18
    This is great news, keep the manufacturing in the USA. Proof that you can keep everything in the States and still have a competitive price. I already have a Kindle Fire, but I would gladly pay an extra $100 for something produced in my own country. Too bad Google's reason for doing so is merely to speed up production.
    Reply
  • scannall 05 July 2012 23:26
    At $300 it isn't going to sell very well. It offers less than the competitors for 3x the price. Seems more of a publicity stunt than anything.
    Reply
  • Osmin 05 July 2012 23:51
    The truth is that everything can be made in America with better quality too. It’s mostly greed when you make a cheap Nike shoe overseas and try to sell it for over $100 in America. Not too long ago, 9 out of 10 things were made in America and those employees paid American taxes and kept our unemployment low. Now every time we buy something made overseas, it helps to remove jobs in America and increase the deficit at the same time. This is the global economy concept, that all of us are competing with foreign workers at near slave wages/conditions.
    Reply
  • boiler1990 06 July 2012 00:13
    If Google is going to make these mainstream device (read: mass produce and sell at lower prices), they are going to have to sell the contract overseas. In the USA we simply don't have the manufacturing base to make the consumer costs of these devices reasonable (hence why the device is $300).

    Labor costs are actually very insignificant when compared to the total cost of manufacturing operations, overhead (owning the property/machinery, utilities, etc), shipping/logistics, inventory, and other major costs. Labor has almost no effect on the end cost to consumers, which renders corporations' arguments about labor costs moot. Intel's fabs cost multi-billions of dollars, yet I doubt their total employee salary at any individual fab exceeds a few million, which is an order of magnitude difference.
    That's why Steve Jobs told Obama that Apple's manufacturing jobs wouldn't return to the US (at least in the near future) - there's no infrastructure to support Apple's (and other tech companies') production operations. It will also take a while for America's manufacturing to catch up to Asia's (if we get it started) - Foxconn and other OEMs have had 100s of plant-years (maybe even 1000s) in which they could work out the kinks, improve their technology and processing, and build up the amenities to support such a large-scale operation.

    I look forward to the day that manufacturing operations return to the USA, especially in this field, but people need to start targeting the root cause of these corporations' resistance rather than an easy scapegoat they try to deceive us with.
    Reply
  • chomlee 06 July 2012 00:13
    As much as I wish we could make everything here in the US, we have to make a choice. If you want to have as much "stuff" that you already have, then we are better off having things made in China. If you are happy with just a few well built products then having things made here would be better. keep in mind that during the days that things where made here, Americans could only afford to have so many things. In the last 30 years since things have been made in China/Asia, our purchasing power has increased by a factor of 10.

    It could be possible to maintain that kind of purchasing power if you where able to automate the manufacturing processes more and didn't have to worry about Unions bringing the costs up. It would be great but it is probably a pipe dream.

    Being an engineer and seeing work exported to other countries, I have seen first hand how even though it is more expensive to do things here, in the long run it can still be much more efficient.
    Reply
  • chomlee 06 July 2012 00:28
    Oh my, I just read what the Q actually does (moreso what it doesn't do) and someone at google needs to be shown the door. Hopefully there will be something more to this than what is currently being shown especially for $300.
    Reply
  • eddieroolz 06 July 2012 00:31
    I'm surprised the Chinese manufacturers would have slowed down the development process. Considering their work environment you could probably get your product readied in months by working in tandem with Google in Mountain View.

    Reply
  • kawininjazx 06 July 2012 01:00
    beardguyThis is great news, keep the manufacturing in the USA. Proof that you can keep everything in the States and still have a competitive price. I already have a Kindle Fire, but I would gladly pay an extra $100 for something produced in my own country. Too bad Google's reason for doing so is merely to speed up production.
    I hate to break it to you, but the kindle fire would be much more that $100 extra if made in the USA. And it's not our fault, its all the regulations, excessive taxes, and unions that drive the prices up. The US could certainly make the best products, but we are our own worst enemy when it comes to building our economy.
    Reply
  • slabbo 06 July 2012 01:07
    I think it's just part of Google's experiment. Work with outside company (Asus) and develop something great and well priced like the Nexus 7. Then work with one inside the USA and you come up with a piece of expensive crap, the Nexus Q.
    Reply