Ryzen Burnout? AMD Board Power Cheats May Shorten CPU Lifespan (Updated)

(Image credit: Shutterstock)
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • flyrobot27
    Bruh Isn't that the same thing as Intel's MCE? This is such a shill post
    Reply
  • Deicidium369
    So admitting that the Ryzen CPU WILL burn out - even without the motherboard shenanigans. Is this called "Heritage Mode" by chance - because the Athlon XPs loved to burn up. Some things never change.

    This is why AMD keeps AM4 around - since it's CPUs WILL burn out at some point - and need to be replaced. All makes sense now.
    Reply
  • JamesSneed
    flyrobot27 said:
    Bruh Isn't that the same thing as Intel's MCE? This is such a shill post

    He wast calling out AMD but instead the motherboard manufactures. Did you even read this article?
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    What happens when you take a 3700X, manually set it to 4300mhz all cores, and use 1.2v? Efficiency!

    Reply
  • escksu
    "however, it also makes the CPU run hotter and potentially negatively affects its life-span, the same ways as overclocking ".
    "Intel expressly approves and even encourages motherboard vendors to adjust power limits to differentiate their products, and those adjustments don't impact chip longevity within the warranty period. ""In contrast, this practice reportedly isn't sanctioned by AMD and could kill your chip sooner than expected. "
    PBO itself is overclocking, period.......

    And then, I am not sure what the article is implying..... Is it saying that Intel chips are good for oc and AMD sucks?? I don't know....
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Deicidium369 said:
    So admitting that the Ryzen CPU WILL burn out - even without the motherboard shenanigans. Is this called "Heritage Mode" by chance - because the Athlon XPs loved to burn up. Some things never change.

    This is why AMD keeps AM4 around - since it's CPUs WILL burn out at some point - and need to be replaced. All makes sense now.

    If you read the link that goes to hwinfo .com you will see that this is the motherboard vendors doing it, not AMD. Specifically named was MSI. It looks like another user reported their Gigabyte board doing it.

    I doubt AMD thought to themselves in early/mid 2016 "You know what? MSI is going to juice our processors in 2020, so we better build AM4 to last!"

    Separately I had a thought about running processors on the hot side, albeit at stock ratings.

    Personally, I keep a spare processor on hand. I run my processors fanless, with massive heatsinks in order to get 100% silence. No fans, fanless power supply, everything. Even at full load I rarely go above the mid-hi 40C range. As I type this it's just under 20C.

    Processors get cheap fairly quickly on Ebay, after a few years. So that its said, I hope the motherboard vendors issue a BIOS update to correct this, now that they have been caught and called out.
    Reply
  • escksu
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    What happens when you take a 3700X, manually set it to 4300mhz all cores, and use 1.2v? Efficiency!



    LOL, I think some of us have read about excessive voltage used by PBO....So, how ironic.....
    Reply
  • Dijky
    Deicidium369 said:
    So admitting that the Ryzen CPU WILL burn out - even without the motherboard shenanigans.
    Where did you get that from?

    Anyway, it's true that silicon ICs will degrade over time. That applies to varying extents at all voltage/power/temperature levels across all manufacturers.
    The typical effect is that an IC will gradually requiring higher voltage to achieve a certain frequency, and ultimately fail.
    The specification targets a certain rather long lifetime, but increasing the operating parameters beyond specification can significantly reduce it.
    This is not news and is widely known to overclockers.

    Deicidium369 said:
    This is why AMD keeps AM4 around - since it's CPUs WILL burn out at some point - and need to be replaced. All makes sense now.
    Be advised that excessive weight of tinfoil on your head can cause neck pain.

    escksu said:
    And then, I am not sure what the article is implying..... Is it saying that Intel chips are good for oc and AMD sucks?? I don't know....

    I'm reading the article and also The Stilt's original post as putting the blame on mainboard makers here, because they are violating the specification:

    "I'd like to stress that despite this exploit is essentially made possible by something AMD has included in the specification, the use of this exploit is not something AMD condones with, let alone promotes. Instead they have rather actively put pressure on the motherboard manufacturers, who have been caught using this exploit," The Stilt added.
    Reply
  • escksu
    ezst036 said:
    If you read the link that goes to hwinfo .com you will see that this is the motherboard vendors doing it, not AMD. Specifically named was MSI. It looks like another user reported their Gigabyte board doing it.

    I doubt AMD thought to themselves in early/mid 2016 "You know what? MSI is going to juice our processors in 2020, so we better build AM4 to last!"

    Separately I had a thought about running processors on the hot side, albeit at stock ratings.

    Personally, I keep a spare processor on hand. I run my processors fanless, with massive heatsinks in order to get 100% silence. No fans, fanless power supply, everything. Even at full load I rarely go above the mid-hi 40C range. As I type this it's just under 20C.

    Processors get cheap fairly quickly on Ebay, after a few years.

    Sounds like you are living near north pole......
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    escksu said:
    LOL, I think some of us have read about excessive voltage used by PBO....So, how ironic.....

    If a value of 50% means it is consuming twice as much power as it reports, then a value of 150% means it is consuming half as much power as it reports, then again it expects to be running at an all core speed of something like 4100mhz at 1.4v, not 4300mhz at 1.2v.
    Reply