Sony Starts Shipping Its Best Selfie Smartphone, The Xperia C4

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • PaulBags
    Selfie phones should find a way to protest their users from themselves, stupid people end up doing things like shooting themselves in the face or walking backwards off a cliff just to take a selfie.
    Reply
  • dstarr3
    Sigh.
    Reply
  • John Wittenberg
    Now now - Darwinism is an important part of weeding the gene pool.
    Reply
  • truerock
    Wide angle lenses take very, very bad photos. Wide angle lenses especially take horrible photos if the subject is close the lens. Only a complete moron would put a wide angle lens in a camera (except for specialty distorted photos for some artistic reason).
    Reply
  • alicepattinson
    I really want to have one and pair it with my Selfie Stick Pro. :)
    Reply
  • voicesaturn
    TSA will be on you just by mentioning this phone at the airport
    Reply
  • Puiucs
    why wide angle for selfies? and only 5mp? that?s just a bad combo
    Reply
  • weilin
    To all those commenting on the wide angle, it's possible/probable that the photo will be processed by software/firmware before being saved as a jpg removing the distortion. Your nose won't take up half the frame.

    It wouldn't surprise me if most front cameras on phones are wide angle-ish (30-35mm), you have to be able to capture the whole face + shoulders + a bit of the background all within one arm's length distance. Every manufacturer may be depending on software to make things the right perspective to some degree.
    Reply
  • Ning3n
    ...because that's what matters most in a smartphone. The "selfie" ability.

    IMO, the worst part is that none of these companies that make mobile devices actually give a flying fox fart about DURABILITY. They care more about profits, features and shareholders, anymore. Than they do for product longevity.
    Reply