Tesla Plans 4nm Chips from TSMC's Arizona Fab: Report

Tesla
(Image credit: Tesla)

TSMC has landed orders from Tesla to make chips for the automaker at its Arizona fab, a report by DigiTimes claims. The foundry will reportedly produce Tesla's advanced self-driving chips on one of its N4 (4nm-class) fabrication processes starting in 2024. Previously Tesla used Samsung Foundry to make the chips for autonomous driving.

Tesla will reportedly be one of the first and one of the largest customers for TSMC's Fab 21 in Arizona. While the report vaguely indicates that Tesla plans to make 'advanced self-driving chip' at N4, it does not disclose which system-on-chip (or SoCs, in plural) it is going to be. While guessing is not exactly good business, it is highly likely that Tesla will use TSMC's services to make its next generation Full Self-Driving Hardware 4 SoC. 

At this point we have no idea what to expect from Tesla's 4th Generation FSD processor, but given that it will use one of the most advanced process technologies that will exist in 2024, expect it to be packed with transistors, compute performance, and features. Meanwhile, if DigiTimes's report is correct and Tesla will be one of the Top 3 customers for TSMC's Fab 21, it means that the automaker plans to produce a significant number of chips there, perhaps not only the FSD SoC. 

Neither Tesla nor TSMC have commented on the report. 

Perhaps the most surprising thing about the report is that Tesla decided to use one of TSMC's N4 (4nm-class) fabrication technologies instead of N5A (5nm-class) manufacturing process specifically developed with automobiles in mind. 

TSMC's N5A was qualified for SoCs that need to meet the AEC-Q100 Grade 1 requirements, which is among the most stringent standards for chip quality and reliability. SoCs that meet the AEC-Q100 Grade 1 standard are mandated to operate in a -40 to +150 degrees Celsius temperature range as well as pass numerous reliability and wear out tests to guarantee that a chip will work for extended amounts of time even in severe conditions. In addition, N5A was qualified to meet the ISO 26262 (functional safety) and the IATF16949 (quality management, defect prevention, variation reduction) standards. 

To meet requirements of all these standards, TSMC had to alter some of N5's characteristics and design rules. While TSMC's N4 technologies belong to the company's N5 family (yet some of N4 variants are not IP-compatible with N5), these production nodes have never been qualified for automotive grade applications. Perhaps, TSMC is preparing an automotive-grade N4 process technology, but so far, we have not heard about it.

Anton Shilov
Freelance News Writer

Anton Shilov is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • bit_user
    Perhaps the most surprising thing about the report is that Tesla decided to use one of TSMC's N4 (4nm-class) fabrication technologies instead of N5A (5nm-class) manufacturing process specifically developed with automobiles in mind.
    Perhaps it's for their humanoid Optimus robots:

    https://builtin.com/robotics/tesla-robot
    Reply
  • Bazzy 505
    bit_user said:
    Perhaps it's for their humanoid Optimus robots:

    https://builtin.com/robotics/tesla-robot

    who know with that snowflake Elon, 2 years is a long time for likes of him,
    maybe is planning to transfer his mind into a "chappie bot" lol
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Bazzy 505 said:
    who know with that snowflake Elon, 2 years is a long time for likes of him,
    maybe is planning to transfer his mind into a "chappie bot" lol
    Yeah, maybe that's why he's cracking the whip, over at Neural Link:

    https://www.reuters.com/technology/musks-neuralink-faces-federal-probe-employee-backlash-over-animal-tests-2022-12-05/

    He needs to get all the pieces in place to transfer his consciousness, before the dementia sets in (assuming it hasn't started, already).
    Reply
  • JohnMD1022
    Or, it could be Tesla phone related.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    JohnMD1022 said:
    Or, it could be Tesla phone related.
    Hadn't heard about that. Makes even less sense to me than the robots.
    Reply
  • svan71
    Funny thing is I never once wished for a self-driving car. Is a self wiping ass next?
    Reply
  • Yeah, I think we can pretty much forget about self driving cars for quite a long time. They clearly are not ready for prime time and still infants in testing. And his tesla is doing relying solely on cameras and visual, I think that’s suicide. His refusal to use LiDAR is ridiculous.
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    svan71 said:
    Funny thing is I never once wished for a self-driving car. Is a self wiping ass next?
    When I saw the car on the other side of the highway spin out in the rain, cross the median and and pass in front of my vehicle just before I t-boned it, I wished the other driver had a self driving vehicle. 140MPH in a 50MPH zone in the rain doesn't cut it. Fortunately we lived.
    Reply
  • kjfatl
    Mandark said:
    Yeah, I think we can pretty much forget about self driving cars for quite a long time. They clearly are not ready for prime time and still infants in testing. And his tesla is doing relying solely on cameras and visual, I think that’s suicide. His refusal to use LiDAR is ridiculous.
    I tend to agree that LIDAR would make the system safer, but I don't know any human driver who has more than 2 eyes and 2 ears and we do OK. Only about 50K deaths per year. It won't be long until driver assistance systems cut that number in half.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    svan71 said:
    Funny thing is I never once wished for a self-driving car.
    It did seem like the industry got ahead of demand, here. I had a similar attitude as you, until I thought about how self-driving could provide mobility to people who can't drive. Think of the elderly or people who have some disability that makes driving difficult or impossible. I'm still quite ambivalent towards it.

    Other societal impacts:
    There's going to be more car-sharing and less ownership.
    Roads will be even more crowded, as parents send the car to shuttle around their kids on trips they, themselves weren't always willing to make.
    Driving should eventually become even safer than today.
    It will eventually become more costly and inconvenient to drive a manually-driven vehicle.
    Reply