Elon Musk's SpaceX to build its own advanced chip packaging factory in Texas – 700mm x 700mm substrate size purported to be the largest in the industry
SpaceX is expanding its production facility to include chip packaging

Although SpaceX does not produce its own chips yet, it’s reportedly expanding into fan-out panel-level packaging (FOPLP) and aiming to build a chip packaging facility in Texas. According to Digitimes, Musk’s company currently has most of its chips packaged by European company STMicroelectronics, but has also subcontracted Taiwanese firm Innolux for orders that the former cannot accommodate.
However, SpaceX is also pushing to build its chips in-house as part of the U.S.’s push for semiconductor independence. The company opened the largest printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing site in the U.S. at Bastrop, Texas, last year, which is intended to supply Starlink’s demand. This is crucial as it can help Musk build a vertically integrated satellite manufacturing line, allowing him to reduce costs and be able to quickly make changes as needed. Chip packaging is the logical next step for SpaceX, especially as a few FOPLP processes are similar to PCB manufacturing, like copper plating, laser direct imaging, and semi-additive processes.
Aside from bringing chip manufacturing back onshore, vertical integration is also great for SpaceX’s long-term profitability. Its 7,600-strong satellite network is currently the largest one in orbit, and it has plans to launch over 32,000 more satellites for truly global coverage. More than that, the company also has several contracts to build satellites for the U.S. government. Given the crucial nature of these systems, the chips that they use must preferably be created within the United States. This will help ensure their physical security and prevent supply chain attacks that could compromise their operation during crucial moments.
Elon Musk isn’t alone in bringing chip packaging back to the U.S. TSMC is planning a $42 billion expansion in 2025 that includes one advanced packaging facility, while Intel has opened a $ 3.5 billion Foveros 3D chip packaging plant in New Mexico in early 2024. GlobalFoundries also announced a $575 million expansion of its New York fab to accommodate and packaging and photonics facility, and more recently announced a $16 billion U.S. expansion.
SpaceX’s entry with FOPLP will give manufacturers more American-made options, especially as this technique is more suitable for aerospace, communications, and space industries. Although they’re not as sexy as cutting-edge chip fabs, like the ones that TSMC operates, packaging plants are just as crucial in the semiconductor supply chain. That’s because they are the ones that turn semiconductors into usable chips, ready for installation on PCBs and other electronics that are practically found everywhere.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
rustbucket4245 Surely bringing even MORE complicated parts of production in-house at a company whose products keep failing spectacularly will fix the problem...Reply -
GenericUser2001
Which SpaceX products are failing? They are successfully launching rockets every two or three days now, and their Starlink network works just fine; I haven't heard anything about unusual failure rates for the satellites or the ground terminals customers use. Now, to be fair, some of their test craft have had some rather explosive issues, but well, that is why they test stuff. The stuff they actually sell to customers seems fine.rustbucket4245 said:Surely bringing even MORE complicated parts of production in-house at a company whose products keep failing spectacularly will fix the problem... -
bolweval
Seems to be a case of MDS, similar to TDS..GenericUser2001 said:Which SpaceX products are failing? They are successfully launching rockets every two or three days now, and their Starlink network works just fine; I haven't heard anything about unusual failure rates for the satellites or the ground terminals customers use. Now, to be fair, some of their test craft have had some rather explosive issues, but well, that is why they test stuff. The stuff they actually sell to customers seems fine. -
ThisIsMe Well, I guess since the blatant market manipulation attempts, intentional non payments, and open support for every other tech company failed to fully force Intel into a hostile takeover situation…Reply
..guess you start building from scratch! -
hotaru251
they've had rockets explode back to back iirc was in news last week.GenericUser2001 said:They are successfully launching rockets every two or three days now, and their Starlink network works just fine
Also starlink sats are apparently being damaged faster than expected. https://futurism.com/the-byte/solar-storms-elon-musk-starlink-satellites -
ryu750 rustbucket4245 said:Surely bringing even MORE complicated parts of production in-house at a company whose products keep failing spectacularly will fix the problem...
Can you give a little more detail on what you mean or this some kind of political babble? -
JamesJones44
That's conflating SpaceX's Starship with their launch rockets. They are two very different things. Their Falcon 9 rockets for example are launched a few times a week without issue. Out of 496 lunches only 3 have failed. I'm not a Musk fan, but using Starship which is an experimental craft as a point of failure is like calling early engineering sample CPUs that underperforms failures because it's not doing well in early engineering samples.hotaru251 said:they've had rockets explode back to back iirc was in news last week.
Also starlink sats are apparently being damaged faster than expected. https://futurism.com/the-byte/solar-storms-elon-musk-starlink-satellites -
JTWrenn
I think we could definitely say Starship has been failing, but people go to far on the anti SpaceX stuff. I personally don't like that we don't have competition and that NASA hasn't kept up. Musk being in charge is spooky as well because the guy is very unstable. That said you can't argue much with their first few gens of rockets, but Starship is starting to feel more and more like it has some root level problems. We will see though.GenericUser2001 said:Which SpaceX products are failing? They are successfully launching rockets every two or three days now, and their Starlink network works just fine; I haven't heard anything about unusual failure rates for the satellites or the ground terminals customers use. Now, to be fair, some of their test craft have had some rather explosive issues, but well, that is why they test stuff. The stuff they actually sell to customers seems fine.
But it is their new product right? I mean you can argue they are different and that is fine, but how often does a product that isn't new fail and then keep getting used?JamesJones44 said:That's conflating SpaceX's Starship with their launch rockets. They are two very different things.
That said none of this is about things failing. It's about vertical market integration to control supply chains and make more money per device. It is generally quite bad for the over all economy. I would rather this be at least forced to be a different company even if they are both owned by Elon. This is much more an SEC issue than an engineering one and unfortunately our SEC has been horrible about vertical integration. -
JRStern I was going to say their need for space-qualified packaging is unique at this point, but hey Elon has always said he doesn't believe in stuff like "space-qualified", commercial is good enough, with a little duct tape and some hammering.Reply -
JamesJones44
That's the point, it's not a new product. It's not on sale, you can't book travel or transport for it, it may never be released for general use. It's a product in development, not a product for sale.JTWrenn said:But it is their new product right? I mean you can argue they are different and that is fine, but how often does a product that isn't new fail and then keep getting used?
Just because the issues can be seen in public with product that is in development doesn't mean it's a broken product. If that was the case the thousands of cars the automakers produce ever year that they never sell to iron out kinks would mean every automobile ever made is a broken product. If you go to Detroit/Phoenix/Toyota City/etc. you will see tons of these cars rolling around on the street, usually in "camo", sometimes with hazard on pulled over on the street. I doesn't mean anything other than they are working on a product that is not yet for sale.