Xreal One Review: X1 chip up Xreal’s game in the AR glasses segment

The Xreal One is an evolutionary update to the AR glasses formula enhanced by the new X1 spatial computing co-processor.

Xreal One
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Xreal is moving closer to an ideal form factor for AR glasses with the One Series.

Pros

  • +

    Thinner frame makes the glasses appear more mainstream

  • +

    X1 chip enhances the user interface and viewing experience

  • +

    Standard electrochromic dimming

  • +

    Comfortable to wear for extended periods

Cons

  • -

    Adapters still needed for older iPhones and consoles

  • -

    Field of view can’t match mixed reality headset

  • -

    $500 price tag limits appeal

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Xreal’s long-running family of augmented reality (AR) glasses is welcoming a new generation. One year after the Air 2 family of AR glasses, the Xreal launched the new One Series, which comprises two distinct products: the Xreal One and the One Pro.

Although you can read more about the One Pro in our initial announcement article, my review today centers around the One. It represents a modest update to the Air 2, with a new in-house spatial computing coprocessor, a slightly wider field of view (FoV), a brighter screen, and a redesigned chassis.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • bit_user
    Thanks for the review, but I'm not interested in any AR with less than full 6-DoF tracking and SLAM. This is needed for proper placement of virtual items in the physical world.
    Reply