Eight Computing Advancements At IBM Research

Introduction

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • cyberkuberiah
    yeah , ibm has one of the largest patent portfolio .
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    I wonder if mote runner could solve the problem siemens has with its cts systems! (ie they don't work anywhere near as good as they do in theory, because they employ a million different sensors and need different staffing depending on the hardware - and at siemens there's no such word as teamwork)
    Reply
  • nonxcarbonx
    no supercomputing elements?
    Reply
  • donaldduck
    And they still cannot make a decent email client :P
    Reply
  • powerbaselx
    Also it's a pitty IBM couldn't convince Apple to keep PowerPC laptops (even moving to Intel Macbooks at the sametime), and also for not bring back a new version of OS/2 operating system in the same line of MacOS.
    For the ones that remember the old OS/2 Warp it was a great operating system very stable with excelent multitasking capabilities.
    Reply
  • void_pointer
    In many ways, IBM transitioned from bring a mere PC manufacturer to a think tank that creates ideas

    IBM? A mere PC manufacturer? OMG! That is mind-shatteringly terrible -- 30 seconds of research would have told you that your understanding of IBM's history is hopelessly and ineptly inaccurate!

    Poor.
    Seriously poor.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    powerbaselxAlso it's a pitty IBM couldn't convince Apple to keep PowerPC laptops (even moving to Intel Macbooks at the sametime), and also for not bring back a new version of OS/2 operating system in the same line of MacOS.For the ones that remember the old OS/2 Warp it was a great operating system very stable with excelent multitasking capabilities.was it? I remember we bought it simply because it was cheaper to buy the os and format the floppies than buy floppies individually!
    Reply
  • IBM acronym I Blame Microsoft ;)
    Reply
  • njalterio
    In many ways, IBM transitioned from bring a mere PC manufacturer...

    Nope. Not reading any further!
    Reply
  • The move to multi-core is not driven by lithographic limitations but instead by device leakage/Power/thermal envelope putting a limitation on maximum clock frequency. Jobs can only be executed faster now if they can be distributed over many cores. Lithography is enabling multi-cores: 2 cores per chip 2 years ago, now 6 and soon 8 cores per chip.
    Reply