China levels anti-trust charges against Nvidia – country accuses chipmaker of violating anti-monopoly regulations, examining the $7 billion Mellanox acquisition
Nvidia's stock dipped by 2% as news broke this morning.
As the trade wars escalate between the US and China, Nvidia has found itself in the crossfire following accusations of possible anti-trust violations by the Chinese Government – per local media. The spotlight is on Nvidia’s acquisition of Mellanox – a conditional approval of which was granted, provided Nvidia would follow strict anti-monopoly guidelines. Following similar inquiries by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) a few months back, Nvidia is now taking flak from both sides.
The probe scrutinizes Team Green’s purchase of the Israeli-American networking firm Mellanox in 2020. Mellanox is the backbone of Nvidia's AI servers, allowing multiple GPUs within a DGX system to be connected via InfiniBand and Ethernet switches. The $7 billion acquisition was approved by Chinese authorities, stipulating that Nvidia will not use this partnership to discriminate against domestic firms. Likewise, Nvidia was obligated to notify rivals about upcoming products within 90 days.
Coming hot on the heels of another wave of sanctions on 140 Chinese companies—now prohibited from importing High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) among other chip-making tools—a retaliatory response was expected. This appears to be part of China’s strategy to fight back against US sanctions, with recent reports suggesting a 20% price cut on domestic goods to counteract Trump’s tariffs.
When asked to comment on the matter by PCMag, Nvidia said, "Nvidia wins on merit, as reflected in our benchmark results and value to customers, and customers can choose whatever solution is best for them. We work hard to provide the best products we can in every region and honor our commitments everywhere we do business. We are happy to answer any questions regulators may have about our business." Since the news broke, Nvidia's stock (NASDAQ: NVDA) plummeted by 2% in pre-market trading early in the morning.
These regulations are not mere formalities, as evidenced by their impacts on many multi-trillion dollar corporations. Google, for example, is under serious pressure from the DoJ and could be forced to sell off Google Chrome for $20 billion over complaints of monopolistic practices. Nonetheless, it could take months or even years before a conclusion is reached, giving Nvidia some breathing space.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
bit_user It would be interesting if Nvidia were forced to open up NVLink for use by competitors.Reply
I'm not sure there'd be any takers, at this point, since momentum is already building behind UALink:
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/amd-broadcom-intel-google-microsoft-and-others-team-up-for-ultra-accelerator-link-an-open-standard-interconnect-for-ai-accelerators -
hotaru251 nvlink & cuda would likely be their way out of any monopoly issues.Reply
issue is whats any nation going to do to nvidia?
a few billion fine? to them thats cost of doing business.
ban sales of products? harming the place that bans em and theres always buyers to replace em.
proving a monopoly against nvidia would be extremely hard as there is amd, intel, & china's homegrown gpu's....they might not be as good as nvidia but they exist and ignoring cuda/nvlink not much nvidia can do about their competitors not catching up fast enough. -
EzzyB could be forced to sell off Google Chrome for $20 billion
If selling a product that is given away for free doesn't scare you off of Chrome, nothing will. -
Blastomonas Plummeted by 2%... I wouldn't call 2% a plummet. It will be restored in no time, no doubt.Reply -
tommo1982 It's going to be interesting how the situation develops. China needs Nvidia for the foreseeable future, so they might use this situation to leverage better prices.Reply -
subspruce
"better prices" at most the RTX 4090D gets replaced with a $1300 4080 Ti that has 20GB of VRAM and the exact same bin of AD102.tommo1982 said:It's going to be interesting how the situation develops. China needs Nvidia for the foreseeable future, so they might use this situation to leverage better prices. -
bit_user
It seems to me like they just gave themselves a $1B rebate.tommo1982 said:China needs Nvidia for the foreseeable future, so they might use this situation to leverage better prices.