Nvidia writes off $5.5 billion in GPUs as US gov't chokes off supply of H20s to China

H100
(Image credit: ServeTheHome)

Nvidia will take a $5.5 billion financial hit after U.S. authorities imposed new export restrictions on its H20 HGX AI GPU designed for the Chinese market, the company said Tuesday.

The U.S. government cited H20's memory and interconnect bandwidth as well as its potential use in supercomputers as reasons for the new restrictions. Nvidia is not alone: the U.S. Department of Commerce has also restricted sales of AMD's Instinct MI308 to China, according to Reuters.

"On April 9, 2025, the U.S. government informed Nvidia that the USG requires a license for export to China (including Hong Kong and Macau) and D:5 countries […] of the company's H20 [GPUs] and any other circuits achieving the H20's memory bandwidth, interconnect bandwidth, or combination thereof," a statement by Nvidia reads.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • A Stoner
    Seems overblown, unless $5.5 billion is the loss they have for selling these to someone else who would want them. The way processors are as limited as they are, I am quite certain that these can find homes in the friendly western world.
    Reply
  • SparklyIO
    A Stoner said:
    Seems overblown, unless $5.5 billion is the loss they have for selling these to someone else who would want them. The way processors are as limited as they are, I am quite certain that these can find homes in the friendly western world.
    Its a loss in accounting terms. The loss is due to the fact that the H20 GPUs are no longer saleable at their original price, and this is their reduced value. It is a non-cash expense that reduces profitability for the quarter. Still an asset in inventory for sale, though.
    And you're right, I'm sure they'll find an AI/crytpo farm somewhere to roam free and burn carbon.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    Also, China can (and does) buy supply from other countries, even with the full datacenter products. It's not like Nvidia is putting in controls in the rack system to shut down if it is running in a specific country.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    Also, China can (and does) buy supply from other countries, even with the full datacenter products. It's not like Nvidia is putting in controls in the rack system to shut down if it is running in a specific country.
    If the AI Diffusion program is being implemented, then it will be a non-trivial challenge for China to get very many of them.
    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/us-ai-diffusion-policy-may-harm-nvidias-sales-most-of-the-chipmakers-ai-gpus-are-affected
    Reply
  • nogaard777
    The best part is seeing another report on this stating Nvidia was already hard at work to design a new SKU just below the government's new limits, when the H40 was already exactly that. Nvidia badly wants that China money and they'll work overtime to give China the fastest possibly GPUs they can legally.

    As well as illegally seeing as how we've already seen reports that after the previous restrictions went into place Singapore's orders magically inflated by 7000% as Nvidia sent them off and looked the other way. Nothing is going to change until the US government goes after and fines NVIDIA to stop it instead of just placing regulation that Nvidia sidesteps.

    Neither Nvidia or AMD have any qualms about selling out their country to make a buck.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    nogaard777 said:
    As well as illegally seeing as how we've already seen reports that after the previous restrictions went into place Singapore's orders magically inflated by 7000% as Nvidia sent them off and looked the other way. Nothing is going to change until the US government goes after and fines NVIDIA to stop it instead of just placing regulation that Nvidia sidesteps.
    As I linked above, the AI Diffusion program was designed to mitigate that sort of thing. We'll see how well it works, if it ever goes into effect.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    bit_user said:
    If the AI Diffusion program is being implemented, then it will be a non-trivial challenge for China to get very many of them.
    https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/us-ai-diffusion-policy-may-harm-nvidias-sales-most-of-the-chipmakers-ai-gpus-are-affected
    Interesting - of course, with all of the security measures/safeguards & people (like investigators) being cut (and cut out) by DOGE in the US, it's almost a guarantee that pretty much won't be implemented or enforced.

    Even that article says: "In Tier 2 countries, entities can import up to 1,700 Nvidia H100 GPUs (or equivalent) without a license, and these do not count toward national AI chip limits." Just like Amazon amassed tons of generic 6-character "sellers", seems like the same would happen in those "Tier 2" countries for "buyers" of the bigger DGX/HGX/etc. systems - they'll just resell it to the restricted entities.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    Even that article says: "In Tier 2 countries, entities can import up to 1,700 Nvidia H100 GPUs (or equivalent) without a license, and these do not count toward national AI chip limits." Just like Amazon just amassed tons of generic 6-character "sellers", seems like the same would happen in those "Tier 2" countries for "buyers" of the bigger DGX/HGX/etc. systems - just reselling it to other restricted entities.
    We don't know how tight the export restrictions in those countries are. The tier-2 designation might depend on their ability to do some of the work to prevent flow-through to tier-3. Their incentive would be staying off the tier-3 list, themselves.

    Also, if lots of mysterious buyers in a tier-2 country appeared out of nowhere, maybe it would attract a response of some kind, like lowering that limit.

    You're probably right that this won't come into effect. One reason I think so is because access to AI GPUs might be seen as a negotiating chip.
    Reply