Chinese scientists create 'breakthrough' solid-state DUV laser light source for chipmaking tools

ASML
(Image credit: ASML)

Researchers from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) have created a "breakthrough" solid-state deep ultraviolet (DUV) laser emitting coherent 193-nm light used for semiconductor photolithography in a lab, reports the International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE).

If the light source technology can be scaled, this device could be used to build lithography tools that make chips using advanced process technologies. However, perspectives on scaling solid-state lasers are unknown.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • bit_user
    The article said:
    However, perspectives on scaling solid-state lasers are unknown.
    I think you mean to say "prospects for", since you're qualifying them as "unknown".

    BTW, is the 6 kHz vs. 9 kHz discrepancy of any significance? Is it not the total output in Joules that really matters? Unless the pulse widths are similar in duration, I don't see their rapidity as relevant comparison. However, I can see that, when trying to optimize a laser's output, increasing the pulse rate seems like one avenue that's natural to pursue.

    I guess another key question would be whether the optical techniques they're using to process the beam should scale to the kinds of power outputs needed.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    bit_user said:
    I think you mean to say "prospects for", since you're qualifying them as "unknown".

    BTW, is the 6 kHz vs. 9 kHz discrepancy of any significance? Is it not the total output in Joules that really matters? Unless the pulse widths are similar in duration, I don't see their rapidity as relevant comparison. However, I can see that, when trying to optimize a laser's output, increasing the pulse rate seems like one avenue that's natural to pursue.

    I guess another key question would be whether the optical techniques they're using to process the beam should scale to the kinds of power outputs needed.
    This appears to be a copy of research already conducted by the University of Tokyo published in 2018.

    https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/2/233
    And a simple google search yielded this IEEE paper on the invention of a solid state single frequency 193-nm laser from 1998.

    C. E. Hamilton, C. B. Doughty, P. M. Roper, R. D. Mead and S. C. Tidwell, "All solid-state, single-frequency 193-nm laser system for deep-UV metrology," Conference Proceedings. LEOS'98. 11th Annual Meeting. IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society 1998 Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36243), Orlando, FL, USA, 1998, pp. 322-323 vol.1, doi: 10.1109/LEOS.1998.737860. keywords: {Solid state circuits;Solid lasers;Metrology;Laser beams;Optical harmonic generation;Frequency;Diode lasers;Laser stability;Nonlinear optics;Optical pumping},
    Reply
  • RaScry
    This seems like a bit of a nothing-burger.

    .070 Watts from an extremely complicated multiple beam, non-linear interference process?

    ‘Solid-state laser’ had me thinking this was starting development of DUV diode laser.
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    This appears to be a copy of research already conducted by the University of Tokyo published in 2018.

    https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/2/233
    That paper looks to be a summary/review of then current research of the subject matter. The paper by the Chinese team presents the research + testing done:
    https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/advanced-photonics-nexus/volume-4/issue-02/026011/Compact-narrow-linewidth-solid-state-193-nm-pulsed-laser-source/10.1117/1.APN.4.2.026011.full
    The Historical Fidelity said:
    And a simple google search yielded this IEEE paper on the invention of a solid state single frequency 193-nm laser from 1998.

    C. E. Hamilton, C. B. Doughty, P. M. Roper, R. D. Mead and S. C. Tidwell, "All solid-state, single-frequency 193-nm laser system for deep-UV metrology," Conference Proceedings. LEOS'98. 11th Annual Meeting. IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society 1998 Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36243), Orlando, FL, USA, 1998, pp. 322-323 vol.1, doi: 10.1109/LEOS.1998.737860. keywords: {Solid state circuits;Solid lasers;Metrology;Laser beams;Optical harmonic generation;Frequency;Diode lasers;Laser stability;Nonlinear optics;Optical pumping},
    The diagrams from the 1998 paper seems to have different stages compared to this new method. Their main claim is "This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of a 193-nm vortex beam generated from a solid-state laser. Such a beam could be valuable for seeding hybrid ArF excimer lasers and has potential applications in wafer processing and defect inspection."

    Titles for news articles might have exaggerated this, but the paper itself is very specific in what 'breakthrough' they actually accomplished.

    Really don't think this is a copy of either the 2018 summary paper or the 1998 research experiment. They probably share similarities since they are research papers in a highly specific scientific field.
    Reply
  • The Historical Fidelity
    TCA_ChinChin said:
    That paper looks to be a summary/review of then current research of the subject matter. The paper by the Chinese team presents the research + testing done:
    https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/advanced-photonics-nexus/volume-4/issue-02/026011/Compact-narrow-linewidth-solid-state-193-nm-pulsed-laser-source/10.1117/1.APN.4.2.026011.full
    The diagrams from the 1998 paper seems to have different stages compared to this new method. Their main claim is "This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of a 193-nm vortex beam generated from a solid-state laser. Such a beam could be valuable for seeding hybrid ArF excimer lasers and has potential applications in wafer processing and defect inspection."

    Titles for news articles might have exaggerated this, but the paper itself is very specific in what 'breakthrough' they actually accomplished.

    Really don't think this is a copy of either the 2018 summary paper or the 1998 research experiment. They probably share similarities since they are research papers in a highly specific scientific field.
    Yes I agree, I was refuting the news article’s unsubstantiated claims, not really the research article itself.
    Reply