Internet Archive hacked and 31 million user accounts leaked — hacking group 'SN_Blackmeta' claims responsibility

Internet Archive's WayBack Machine
(Image credit: Internet Archive's WayBack Machine)

According to Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle and 'Have I been Pwned?' founder Troy Hunt via Bleeping Computer The Internet Archive was hacked. Resulting in a data breach of its user authentication database containing 31 million accounts.  Users found out when they saw the website displaying a JavaScript alert to let visitors know the site was breached. Along with the data breach, the website was defaced and DDoS'd (Distributed Denial of Service). 

The following was the message on the pop-up:

"Have you ever felt like the Internet Archive runs on sticks and is constantly on the verge of suffering a catastrophic security breach? It just happened. See 31 million of you on HIBP!."

Data breach look-up website 'Have I been Pwned?' (HIBP) Creator Troy Hunt confirmed that the they received the user database as a 6.4 GB SQL file approximately nine days ago. It was further confirmed that it contained the email addresses, screen names Bcrypt-hashed passwords and the timestamps of password changes. Based on a timestamp in the last entry in the database, it is likely it was hacked on September 28, 2024. HIBP subscribers, just like one of our editors, received a notification after the hack was confirmed by the Internet Archive. 

Notification sent by 'Have I been pwned?' data breach notifier to respective subscribers.

(Image credit: Future)

Hunt confirmed that The Internet Archive has begun its disclosure process and The Internet Archive team confirmed that the data would be loaded into the service in 72 hours, he has not received any communication from the team, since. It is also not known how the hack was possible, resulting in such a large user data leak.

Jason Scott from the Internet Archive confirmed that they've disabled the JavaScript library, scrubbed the systems and upgraded security. At the time of writing, neither The Internet Archive nor The WayBack Machine is back online. He confirmed that no reasoning or demands were made to them. As of now, an account on X called SN_Blackmeta claims responsibility for this hack and also said they are planning another attack tomorrow. The target for the next website is not revealed at this time. Internet Archive has also not yet published any public statement.

The Internet Archive carries a wealth of information from internet resources to books, news, footage, videos, music and other information, accessible and available to the public. One will be able to reset their passwords once the website is up and perhaps receive an email from IA for a reset. It should also be noted that The Internet Archive confirmed in May this year that it is facing sustained attacks and a result has been struggling against such attacks. 

It is also best if users have random passwords for different websites to avoid any situation of a leaked password used by anyone to access accounts of other websites and services. For those who use the same password for multiple websites, it is best if those are also changed.

TOPICS
Roshan Ashraf Shaikh
Contributing Writer

Roshan Ashraf Shaikh has been in the Indian PC hardware community since the early 2000s and has been building PCs, contributing to many Indian tech forums, & blogs. He operated Hardware BBQ for 11 years and wrote news for eTeknix & TweakTown before joining Tom's Hardware team. Besides tech, he is interested in fighting games, movies, anime, and mechanical watches.

  • bit_user
    This is why we can't have nice things.
    Reply
  • Exploding PSU
    What did the IA ever do to deserve that...
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Exploding PSU said:
    What did the IA ever do to deserve that...
    Oh, lots. Many powerful people, organizations, and other interests would like to scrub certain things from the Internet. As long as Internet Archive maintains a record of these inconvenient facts, they will remain a target.

    If I had to guess which site is next, it'd probably be Wikipedia. That would certainly be on the hit list of most who would target Internet Archive. Let's hope their security is better.

    There are entire countries where access to these sites is blocked. However, there are usually ways around those blocks. Furthermore, if there's something embarrassing about a government, it's not good enough just to keep their own people from seeing it.
    Reply
  • davisch
    bit_user said:
    Oh, lots. Many powerful people, organizations, and other interests would like to scrub certain things from the Internet. As long as Internet Archive maintains a record of these inconvenient facts, they will remain a target.

    If I had to guess which site is next, it'd probably be Wikipedia. That would certainly be on the hit list of most who would target Internet Archive. Let's hope their security is better.
    Seems like it might be happening already. Just saw an article that said Wikipedia is starting to get filled with AI generated garbage with "references" that don't contain any of the claimed information.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Exploding PSU said:
    What did the IA ever do to deserve that...

    The pen is mightier than the sword.
    Reply
  • Kondamin
    davisch said:
    Seems like it might be happening already. Just saw an article that said Wikipedia is starting to get filled with AI generated garbage with "references" that don't contain any of the claimed information.
    Wikipedia has been a source of disinformation for nearly a decade, that place is lost.
    We’re only a tiny bit away from having to go to the library again if we went to find out about things
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Kondamin said:
    Wikipedia has been a source of disinformation for nearly a decade, that place is lost.
    We’re only a tiny bit away from having to go to the library again if we went to find out about things
    That seems too pessimistic. It's still pretty good on noncontroversial topics, but it pays to check the sources and make sure they actually support what's being claimed. On more controversial subjects, they tend to lock pages to protect them from vandalism. It's not perfect, but it can help.

    Ultimately, Wikipedia isn't a primary source and they're very clear about this. It's merely a digest of what other information is available from reputable sources. It's not all good or bad, but rather a tool that can be used effectively or poorly. Your experiences with it will depend a lot on what expectations you bring to it.

    IMO, blanket negative statements about it are almost as harmful to it as the vandals, themselves.
    Reply
  • trogar
    alternative archive will be useful ( only one for whole planet is not enough )
    Reply
  • bit_user
    trogar said:
    alternative archive will be useful ( only one for whole planet is not enough )
    There are others which I think mostly specialize in certain areas. I once tried one of them, but it didn't have what I was looking for. Internet Archive did.
    Reply
  • trogar
    bit_user said:
    but it didn't have what I was looking for.
    So low-skill users fall in darkness ( until alternative archive will start )
    Reply