Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

IBM Settles, Papermaster is Apple-bound

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 10 comments

Apple yesterday announced that Mark Papermaster would be joining the company as senior vice president of Devices Hardware Engineering. Papermaster will start work at the Cupertino company on April 24 and will be reporting directly to Steve Jobs. While Apple announces the newcomer as casually as can be, it ends the drama surrounding the former IBM chief’s decision to leave the company to lead Apple’s iPod and iPhone hardware engineering teams.

Other than one line clarifying, “the litigation between IBM and Mark Papermaster has been resolved,” Apple makes no mention of the court proceedings. The company announced Papermaster’s arrival back in October but IBM, Papermaster’s former employer, claimed that if he were to work for Apple he would be in breach of a non-compete agreement he had signed when he worked for IBM.

A federal judge ordered Papermaster to step back from his position at Apple until the matter was resolved and it later emerged that Judge Kenneth Karas felt Papermaster’s presence at Apple could cause IBM some serious damage.

“Because Mr. Papermaster has been inculcated with some of IBM’s most sensitive and closely guarded technical and strategic secrets, it is no great leap for the Court to find that Plaintiff has met its burden of showing a likelihood of irreparable harm," he explained.

Papermaster then filed a countersuit, his lawyers claiming that the agreement was unenforceable, because the deal was governed by the laws of the state of New York, while Papermaster lives in Texas and Apple is based in California

"Both states hold that such non-competition agreements are unenforceable as a matter of public policy," the countersuit said.

Now, three months after this whole thing started, it seems Papermaster and IBM have come to an agreement. IBM released a statement containing details of the resolution reached. Basically Papermaster can start work at Apple, once he’s been out of IBM six months. That said, he has to report back in July and again in October and certify that he has not used or disclosed any important IBM stuff to Apple. Check out the full deal below.

“IBM and Mr. Papermaster have now agreed on a resolution of the lawsuit under which Mr. Papermaster may not begin employment with Apple until April 24, 2009, six months after leaving IBM, and will remain subject thereafter to all of his contractual and other legal duties to IBM, including the obligation not to use or disclose IBM’s confidential information. Following commencement of his employment with Apple, Mr. Papermaster will be required to certify, in July 2009 and again in October 2009, that he has complied with his legal obligations not to use or disclose IBM’s confidential or proprietary information. The preliminary injunction will be replaced by a court order under which the Court will have continuing jurisdiction over this matter, including compliance enforcement powers, until October 24, 2009, one year after Mr. Papermaster’s departure from IBM.”


Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
  • 1 Hide
    Pei-chen , January 28, 2009 12:03 PM
    One year is not enough considering IBM has invested in some long term research projects. Apple might be getting a sneak peek into the future of IT industry.
  • 0 Hide
    GoodBytes , January 28, 2009 1:23 PM
    hang on... his name is really Papermaster ?
  • 0 Hide
    JMcEntegart , January 28, 2009 2:06 PM
    Really. And I felt duped with McEntegart.
  • Display all 10 comments.
  • 0 Hide
    curnel_D , January 28, 2009 2:34 PM
    McEntegart isnt nearly as bad as mine. Be greatful. :p 
  • 0 Hide
    JMcEntegart , January 28, 2009 2:36 PM
    Years of being called McEnfaggot. You decide.
  • 0 Hide
    curnel_D , January 28, 2009 2:55 PM
    Real last name = Sweat (Not kidding). And how in the world do they get McEnfaggot out of McEntegart? Geesh.
  • 0 Hide
    JMcEntegart , January 28, 2009 2:59 PM
    Because you're pronouncing it wrong. McEntegart/Mac-in-tag-ert. Try saying it with an Irish accent, usually helps. Yes, you clearly win. Sweat, yikes. Bet it still feels like losing, though! :p 
  • 0 Hide
    curnel_D , January 28, 2009 3:10 PM
    Well that makes sense then. : \
  • 0 Hide
    JMcEntegart , January 28, 2009 3:12 PM
    Tragic, tragic sense.
  • 0 Hide
    somasaint , January 28, 2009 4:20 PM
    complaints? from ppl w/ pronounceable names!

    i tsk in your general directions...