Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Engineer turns old 3D printer into a tattoo gun that you definitely shouldn't use at home
Earlier this week, YouTuber and hardware hacker Emily The Engineer unveiled how she successfully converted a 3D printer into a fully functioning tattoo machine, which was then subsequently tested on her friend Dan, who reportedly came up with the whole idea, to begin with [h/t Hackaday]. Amusingly, the full video documenting the process includes Dan calling relevant family and friends to get opinions across the board, including his girlfriend expressing disapproval but slightly acquiescing when told it may end up being safe.
So, is it safe? Probably, but Emily still firmly recommends against viewers following in her footsteps in the full video. Even executing the tattoo required extensive hardware modding the 3D printer and rewriting its firmware, making it (mostly) only operate on a single axis and be able to use a tattoo gun properly.
So, what are the broader ramifications of a project like this? Should we expect at-home tattoo machines to be retail products any time soon? At retail, probably not— but the existence of this project does show that some degree of tattooing work is indeed possible through the powers of automation, careful tweaking of existing technology, and lots of medical caution. Emily was wise to add a literal panic button to this machine if a tattoo goes horribly wrong.
However, this project isn't designed to replace existing tattoo artists or anything of the sort. For anybody outside this specific scenario, it'll almost always be a better, less expensive choice to go to a highly rated local tattoo artist and get your ink done there.
It is fascinating that this is possible as far as potential alternative uses for 3D printers go. It totally makes sense, considering the accuracy of the machinery required to create 3D prints. While the Z axis has largely been removed from the equation thanks to all this modding to draw 2D images, the level of precision needed in a 3D printer and by a tattoo artist is pretty similar. Hence, a modded 3D printer could do something like this.
For your health and/or sanity, we seriously would not recommend repurposing any of the best 3D printers for such a dangerous DIY project. Such things can quickly go wrong and put you in the hospital if you don't know what you're doing— or even if you do know what you're doing and end up disastrously unlucky. Many things in life are best left to a steady human hand who knows what they're doing, not a machine that happens to be capable of approximating it.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.
Even executing the tattoo required extensive hardware modding the 3D printer and rewriting its firmware, making it (mostly) only operate on a single axis and be able to use a tattoo gun properly.
Does this mean it only works left-to right with no back-and-forth movement, like an old typewriter, which needed a separate mechanism to move the paper up and down?
