AMD Talks Steamroller: 15% Improvement Over Piledriver

We are getting our first look at the "Steamroller”, which is the core for the "Kaveri" APU, among others. AMD is expecting to see a 15 percent improvement in performance per watt over the "Piledriver" core. The improvements are seen through design-level improvements rather than process-level improvements. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • Maxx_Power
    That would be nice. Hopefully it will be launched on time.
    Reply
  • fedelm
    First and foremost, let's hope Piledriver can deliver on the desktop, especially after the bulldozergate. If it does, then this is excellent news.

    I want AMD to be able to give intel a run for its money performance-wise. Doesn't have to match the i-xxs, just provide a decent, reliable and affordable option.

    Cheers.
    Reply
  • Pinhedd
    Good.

    It sounds like they've learned a lot from Bulldozer. If they can keep pulling off 15-20% improvements in 10-12 month intervals than perhaps AMD can still be a viable competitor to Intel
    Reply
  • aznshinobi
    I feel like with Piledriver and Steamroller AMD will finally be able to put some pressure on Intel.
    Reply
  • dalethepcman
    If the 5-10% scheduling efficiency and 20-30% increase in ops along with the increased clock rates comes out to a 25-30% increase in performance then AMD will be in a happy place, and so will the consumer. If this turns out to be a bust, it would be really really bad for the industry unless your name in Intel.
    Reply
  • redyellowblueblast
    Us AM3+ users never received any Piledriver based CPUs. Are we getting Steamroller instead?
    Reply
  • leeashton
    well we currently know that trinity on the mobile platform out performs any intel Chip, so AMD has the mobile performance crown
    Reply
  • vistaofdoom
    leeashtonwell we currently know that trinity on the mobile platform out performs any intel Chip, so AMD has the mobile performance crownGood troll there...
    Reply
  • pharoahhalfdead
    Will it be 32nm or 22nm? It would be nice if AMD could get away from 32nm in a swift, timely fashion. Let's hope they don't stay here for four years like they stayed at 45nm.
    Reply
  • cscott_it
    In addition to all of this, they re-acquired one of their lead designers from the K8 days who co-authored their original x64 endeavor. As we all recall, those were some major wins for AMD. The gentlemen had been a lead designer for Apple's mobile segment, so his chops are still in pretty good shape.

    Even if this generation does fail, I have a feeling they will be doing something right in the next 5 years.
    Reply