Samsung ATIV Book 9 Lite to Launch This Month

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • voodoobunny
    768p and no touch screen for $799? Bleuch. The Asus X202 is still smaller and way cheaper and has a Core i3 and a (sucky and unreliable but still a) touch screen.

    C'mon, Samsung, you can do better than that.
    Reply
  • BringMeAnother
    I don't get it. This has made the new on Tom's, Engadget, Notebook Check and maybe others. This model doesn't really have any stand outs. It made me excited for nothing since the 9 Plus is one of the model I'm really considering buying.
    Reply
  • DryCreamer
    $799 for 1366x768?? I don't care if it is a touch screen, there's NO EXCUSE for that!

    Please, don't buy this... as long as its still profitable for OEMs to push 768p, they will continue to use it :/

    Dry
    Reply
  • DryCreamer
    I can get better spec than that from an HP sleekbook for $380 BRAND NEW here in the states :/

    Dry
    Reply
  • RedundantInk
    Enough with the 768p resolution already, it has no place on any screen bigger than 12"
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    Well, I'm not thrilled about 768p but it's on a fairly small display, so not really much lower PPI than a 17.3" 1080p. Besides, resolution is not the only measure of a monitor's quality. If it was, there'd be no reason to ever test them. Similarly, two evenly spec'd 13" devices are not guaranteed to be the same quality, thickness, etc. Maybe this thing is really thin and premium built. Not that I'd ever buy one, but it looks nice from the pics.

    Anyway, it's still at least $100 too high.
    Reply