Crytek Taking on Onlive, Facebook with GFACE

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Parsian
    finally I know what that "GFace" logo is all about at the bottom of CryDev.net and mycrysis.com webpages.
    Reply
  • tlmck
    Forget Gface. Where do I get that ultra thin laptop?
    Reply
  • The system requirements for GFACE are too high.
    Reply
  • Trialsking
    But will GFACE be able to play Crysis?
    Reply
  • archange
    Gface?!?
    Seriously??

    Bad name aside, I see lawsuits coming from all directions...
    Reply
  • NuclearShadow
    While I can see streaming services that are multi-platform being a huge part of our future, I simply cannot see it today due to bandwidth limitations. Media is also getting more and more demanding while the ISPs aren't doing much to resolve the issues that already exists.
    Reply
  • Flameout
    gimme native linux 64bit gaming and i'm sold
    Reply
  • sonnyd09
    Where's Origin?
    Reply
  • __-_-_-__
    streamygame.com
    Reply
  • Goldengoose
    NuclearShadowWhile I can see streaming services that are multi-platform being a huge part of our future, I simply cannot see it today due to bandwidth limitations. Media is also getting more and more demanding while the ISPs aren't doing much to resolve the issues that already exists.Home entertainment is definitely up to scratch. 5-6 years ago i remember aiming for a ping of around 120-180ms, anywhere between there was brilliant. Nowadays, loading LoL or playing an FPS i'll be seeing latency of around 30-40ms. Now your telling me there's been little to no improvement? I know i get a lot of downvotes from saying this in other comment sections, but i really do think onlive is a brilliant idea. True we all hate it as we see it as another desktop killer and i am included in the bunch who want to keep these machines alive but we can't stubbornly stand in the way of progress.

    On a separate note, they haven't got a chance of taking on steam, they have too many sales and have such a nice client i can't see anyone topping it.
    Reply