Alphabet Eyes Wireless Networks As Google Fiber's Rollout Halts

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • problematiq
    NOES!! (Oklahoma City)
    Reply
  • jaber2
    WiFi will replace cable, I hope
    Reply
  • Spazzy
    Can they keep the ping down doing it with Wireless access? For gamers, latency is as important if not more than actual speed. This doesn't seem like such a good alternative to me.
    Reply
  • problematiq
    18785376 said:
    Can they keep the ping down doing it with Wireless access? For gamers, latency is as important if not more than actual speed. This doesn't seem like such a good alternative to me.

    It depends if they use a mesh network or not, and how many in the mesh are tied to the backbone. (A Wireless Mesh network is a series of AP's (Acess Points) connected together via wireless without using a fiber backbone)
    Using a Mesh network increases the latency, but most all wireless providers use to to reduce construction costs.
    Reply
  • Brian_R170
    Damn, I guess Cox will be raising my rates in the Phoenix area... again.

    I keep reading that 5G is going to be a game-changer, but I'm not convinced it will roll out quick enough or be a suitable replacement for fiber/cable/telco.
    Reply
  • grimfox
    Hopefully their wireless technology is better than 4g. I supposedly have 4 bars of 4gLTE at work but barely see speeds over 1mbps. That tower is less than a mile away. In my house the signal is even more spotty it's easier to use my personal wifi. But if my wifi has to rely on a getting to the same spotty signal? not worth it.
    Reply
  • problematiq
    18787873 said:
    Hopefully their wireless technology is better than 4g. I supposedly have 4 bars of 4gLTE at work but barely see speeds over 1mbps. That tower is less than a mile away. In my house the signal is even more spotty it's easier to use my personal wifi. But if my wifi has to rely on a getting to the same spotty signal? not worth it.

    Wireless towers have an umbrella dead zone near them, so if you live too close to a tower you get no signal.
    Reply
  • problematiq
    18787829 said:
    Damn, I guess Cox will be raising my rates in the Phoenix area... again.

    I keep reading that 5G is going to be a game-changer, but I'm not convinced it will roll out quick enough or be a suitable replacement for fiber/cable/telco.

    The downside for 5G is that it will require higher frequency on the EM spectrum. The higher the frequency the lower the coverage. 5G might deploy slowly in larger city's but it will most likely not make its way to rural areas or smaller towns. You will probably be fine in Phoenix though.
    Reply
  • Beholder88
    It's all about money. Money wasn't flowing in the correct direction somewhere, and they see wireless as a higher yield financially. Who wants to bet they try to buy a cellular provider...
    Reply
  • jeremy2020
    It has a lot to do with Make Ready rules that make it take 9 months to get access to a utility pole to lay down fiber. AT&T and Comcast make it as difficult as possible for Google or anyone else to get access to deploy new fiber to threaten their monopolies.
    Reply