ARM And AMD Partner On OpenCL

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • HansVonOhain
    If only the programs were to use OpenCL. I wish all the best to AMD! You will catch up!
    Reply
  • clonazepam
    "and AMD could have simply invited ARM to annoy Intel."

    Didn't AMD, in the past, drive to press event(s) meant for Intel, and whisk 'em off (the press) to AMD's own showing right under intel's nose? I think they were lured off b/c AMD had actual working hardware. Might of been the early battles of 64 architecture... I cant recall.

    I just want to say I completely condone and support this type of shenanigans.
    Reply
  • Flameout
    so opencl is better than opengl?
    Reply
  • theorland
    one step forward to event intel vs the world
    Reply
  • JustinHD81
    Flameoutso opencl is better than opengl?Open Compute Language v Open Graphics Language....former for doing general processing on a graphics card, the latter a graphics standard that used to compete with DirectX. Different standards for different purposes.
    Reply
  • jprahman
    OpenCL is an API for parallel computing on both CPUs and GPUs, while OpenGL is an 3D graphics API. They have nothing in common other than that they leverage GPUs to get their work done.
    Reply
  • iam2thecrowe
    I have been waiting a long time to finally see some more emphasis on OpenCL; it is a very good step in the right direction.
    Reply
  • verbalizer
    here we go.!
    time to play ball.
    Reply
  • Filiprino
    This can be awesome. OpenCL would be über-nice if it reaches a good state-of-the-art. CUDA is only for NVIDIA cards while OpenCL can run on all cards and platforms (DirectCompute is DirectX only).
    Reply
  • No thanks, there's no way OpenCL will become mainstream. If they want to leverage distributed computing on GPUs, do so at the compiler level so that we can leverage the already existing concurrent programming languages like OCaml, Scala, Erlang... There is no way more than a few individuals will bother going to OpenCL. Instead I'm simply going to use Tilera with its 64 cores, or Intel's Knight's Corner, which will allow me to use existing standard programming languages on their many-core hardware. Intel will simply ramp up its production of Knights Corner to 128, 256... cores, and that will be the end for OpenCL and CUDA.
    Reply