Apple M2 Pro and M2 Max Benchmark Results Show Strengths of New MacBook Pros

MacBook Pro 14 and 16
(Image credit: Apple)

The first reviews of Apple's refreshed MacBook Pro and Mac Mini are here, and, with them, we're getting to see impressions of Apple's new M2 Pro and M2 Max processors. The design of the machines are effectively the same (minus some port changes on the Mac Mini), so the big changes are all in the silicon.

While we still hope to get our hands on the new processors to run them through their paces, we're pouring over the existing results to see what reviewers think of the new chips. We're particularly interested in two things: performance and battery life. That's not to say the new system's designs aren't important — I own an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and like it very much, minus the notch — but we're focusing on what's been changed and improved.

The general consensus seems to be that the new chips bring some solid performance upgrades, especially for those looking to upgrade from older Intel-based systems.

The M2 Pro can be found in all three of Apple's new computers: the Mac Mini, 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros. The base model has a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU, but most of the reviews out there have a step up: the full 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU. The 16-core neural engine is the same across both chips. Some reviewers saw the M2 Pro in the laptop, while others saw it in the Mac Mini.

The M2 Max is only in the laptops: the 14 and 16-inch MacBook Pros. It starts with a 12-core CPU and 30-core GPU, and the upgrade nets you a 38-core GPU. Both have a 16-core neural engine.

We've collated some scores from our sister sites Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, as well as some of our prior review data on the 2021 models.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Geekbench 5 Single-coreGeekbench 5 Multi-coreHandbrakeBattery LifeRise of the Tomb Raider
MacBook Pro 14-inch, M2 Pro (12-core CPU, 19-core GPU, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD)1,94114,9654:0314:0248.6 fps
MacBook Pro 14-inch M2 Max (12-core CPU, 38-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB of SSD)1,92514,9394:0612:5173 fps
MacBook Pro 16-inch, M1 Max (10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD)1,78112,6834:4815:3173 fps
MacBook Pro 14-inch, M1 Pro, (8-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD)1,76812,4774:5114:0824.9 fps

The performance scores those sites have published are fascinating. The two CPUs both have 12 cores, but the M2 Pro has 32GB of RAM and the M2 Max has 64GB. The other big difference is the GPU: The M2 Pro has a 19-core GPU, while the M2 Max has a 38-core GPU.

I was initially surprised to see that these chips produced the scores they did in Geekbench 5, with the M2 Pro slightly ahead of the M2 Max. My thoughts are that these scores are pretty close, and Apple should be using the same CPU cores here. While the M2 Max's 64GB of RAM should be helping a bit, these may be within standard error. It's also possible that, because the M2 Max has so much going on on the chip, it may have been hampered slightly in multi-core when those GPU cores weren't being used. We're hoping to get our hands on the hardware soon to see what we can learn about it.

On battery life, it appears the M2 Pro-based machine is on par with the 2021 model, while the M2 Max machine took a surprising dive. Of course, battery life is going to depend on what you're doing with the device. 

In Rise of the Tomb Raider, the Max shows its might with the highest frame rate at 1920 x 1200. Keep in mind that this is an older game, and not one designed for Apple Silicon or Metal. The M2 Max is also playable at 2024 x 1964 at 34 fps.

Other New Features

As an M1 Pro owner, the most appealing features are the upgraded Wi-Fi and HDMI standards. The M2 chips bump up these laptops to Wi-Fi 6E, HDMI 2.1, and Bluetooth 5.3. Will I use these all? Probably not, but I love to future-proof (and I do have a Wi-Fi 6E router).

HDMI 2.1 means you can even push 8K monitors at 60 Hz, which is overkill for most but may fit some creative workflows. For most people, the benefit is that you can get 4K at more than 60 fps. Apple claims you can reach 240 Hz, but you may have a hard time finding a monitor that actually supports that. 

We hope to get our hands on these laptops soon to see for ourselves, but initial impressions are good. It sounds like Apple's second round of pro-grade Apple Silicon can hang with other high-end chips. If the new MacBooks have the same great displays, keyboards, and speakers, these will be great for Mac users willing to cough up the cash (and deal with the notch).

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and Mastodon @FreedmanAE.mastodon.social.

  • PlaneInTheSky
    Instead of Microsoft wasting thier money on ChatGPT, they should start working more on Windows on ARM. Apple notebooks are leaving every other notebook in the dust.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    Apple notebooks are leaving every other notebook in the dust.
    So shouldn't they be the #1 selling notebook? But they aren't.
    Reply
  • crimsonfilms
    peachpuff said:
    So shouldn't they be the #1 selling notebook? But they aren't.

    Performance and sellability are not the same thing. That is like saying RTX 4090 should be the #1 GPU on the market.
    Reply
  • Sippincider
    peachpuff said:
    So shouldn't they be the #1 selling notebook? But they aren't.

    That MacBook Pro 14", M2 Max 64GB/2TB, lists for... $4100.

    Unless you NEED that level of hardware, to earn your living, you're going to look across the aisle at PC laptops. Yeah there is some real junk, but there are solid machines to be found as well if you do your homework.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    Instead of Microsoft wasting thier money on ChatGPT, they should start working more on Windows on ARM. Apple notebooks are leaving every other notebook in the dust.
    Why?
    What does ARM bring to the party?
    Reply
  • palladin9479
    peachpuff said:
    So shouldn't they be the #1 selling notebook? But they aren't.

    Pfft, it's a Mac not a notebook...
    Reply
  • eye4bear
    What everyone seems to always forget is that outside of the M1/M2 chip and the displays, all the rest of the hardware is pretty much generic PC, yet Apple fanboys keep paying the hugely marked up prices. Sure, it should be a couple of hundred dollars more, but not almost double the price.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    they should start working more on Windows on ARM.
    Specifically what is lacking, in Windows on ARM?

    USAFRet said:
    What does ARM bring to the party?
    Better perf/W is the main thing.

    For laptops, that translates into better battery life and/or smaller & lighter (because they can use a smaller battery and cooling solution).
    Reply
  • bit_user
    eye4bear said:
    Apple fanboys keep paying the hugely marked up prices. Sure, it should be a couple of hundred dollars more, but not almost double the price.
    That's just the Apple Tax. Quite a lot of people are willing to pay it* - just look at iPhone marketshare!

    * not me.
    Reply