Crytek Engine Subscription Plan Targets Game Making Startups

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • everlast66
    Great option from Crytek, giving small developers a chance to use a great engine and tools. Unlike greedy Epic/Unreal with their requirement for a double monthly fee and 5% royalty from your revenue. Keep in mind this is 5% of the total income, which means if you only have 10% profit after expenses they want half of it!
    Reply
  • jasonelmore
    5% of gross revenue fee is just about the same as having a royalty fee lol.
    Reply
  • photonboy
    Epic is definitely NOT being greedy. Unreal 4 Engine has lots of features that can save many, many hours of work which could easily add up to more than the 5% cost.Obviously the game developers would weight the pros and cons when choosing what tools they use.I'm not sure why people think this is a rip-off because all companies have costs. Would you tell the truckers that they shouldn't use FUEL because it's 75% the cost of their revenue?
    Reply
  • Kieran Warren
    Unreal is a much easier engine to use compared to CryEngine and much better for indie developers, Cry Engine is only good for big developers who have the time to make it worthwhile using that engine
    Reply
  • Blazer1985
    Plus, with unreal engine, you can target ios and android devices. Definetly worth the money imho.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    Finally, indies shall prevail.Too bad Crytek couldn't of gone indie with Crysis 3. I choose to believe EA ruined it.
    Reply
  • Gillerer
    5% of gross revenue fee is just about the same as having a royalty fee lol.
    That 5 % was on Epic's UnrealEngine 4, not Crytek's CryEngine which this news story was about.
    Reply
  • ddpruitt
    I'm amazed at all the people bashing Epic for asking 5%. The hardest part of a game to develop is the engine, if you use a prebuilt engine you can focus on the content of your game which easily cover 5% of your production costs. Making a game engine isn't cheap a short list of recent titles that use Unreal: Batman Arkham Series, BioShock Infinite, Borderlands, Gears of War, Mass Effect, XCOM, and the list go on. By building a good engine you can free Game Designers to design games, a good engine doesn't come cheap. Homegrown engines are obvious, they're unpolished, buggy, and just don't work well (SimCity anyone?). I would expect Crytek to have a some sort of Royalty/Gross fee.
    Reply
  • mrmike_49
    says $10/month WHILE they are developing the game, but HOW MUCH once game is developed and marketed?????????????
    Reply
  • Damon Palovaara
    I wish Unreal Engine had a trial version I could try
    Reply