FCC Announces Plan To 'Gut Net Neutrality'

49

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • dstarr3
    Trump & Co. are doing this in the name of keeping government regulation out of business, which isn't entirely braindead at a glance, except for the fact that the government has had to intervene with its recent regulations because corporations have made a habit of excessively and severely negatively exploiting the nation's citizens for profit. And this is just another instance of the swamp trying to roll back on every protection citizens have from corporate exploitation.
    Reply
  • why_wolf
    You'll all notice how Pai tried to bury this announcement behind Trumps tax announcement. Sneaky, sneaky.
    Reply
  • LORD_ORION
    Profit growth needs to be maintained.
    Prepare to pay more.

    Want don't you privatize roads and see how that works out. ;)
    Reply
  • WRXSTIGuy
    The internet was great when the government wasn't involved. It seems like whatever they touch turns to dirt.
    Reply
  • toadhammer
    FCC Myth: We'll let ISPs do whatever they want, and somehow consumers will benefit.
    FCC Truth: We think you're all stupid, and money is more important.
    Reply
  • 10tacle
    "Many Americans simply don't have access to broadband internet. The FCC said in January 2016 that 10% of all Americans lack access to a 25Mbps down and 3Mbps up connection. Pew said in December 2015 that many Americans can't afford broadband access or are in "hard-to-reach" areas that won't get broadband any time soon."

    So what? If you live out in the middle of nowhere, you have limited medical care, grocery shopping and retail shopping options too. Why should internet access of any speed be any different than that? I am a co-owner of a mountain cabin in western North Carolina. We have barely 5Mbps download and 1Mbps upload. That's a heck of a lot faster than what we had 15 years ago *anywhere*. That has nothing to do with the original root intent of NN which was to stop throttling and unfair trade practices. Like the complaints of "fast lanes" where some could pay more and get certain services not available to others (same complaining we hear about HOV toll payers who get to use them and just pay more for acces driving as a single driver).

    "It's also easier for them to charge whatever they want for their service if there's no alternative. In a statement released by Common Cause, a rights organization, former FCC commissioner Michael Copps said {blah blah blah}:"

    Since when is high speed internet or internet access at all a "right" like a civil right or something? Who says so? The Constitution sure doesn't. Oh sure, the "promote the general welfare"and all that, but the last time I checked, people can live without the internet in their home. There's free WiFi out there just about everywhere and even free computers at public libraries (where public transportation can take you in larger cities if you don't have a car).

    19614708 said:
    The internet was great when the government wasn't involved. It seems like whatever they touch turns to dirt.

    First it was whining about internet access at all is limited, now it's that not everyone can get "cheap" high speed internet. Thank GOD we don't have the federal government taking over our ISPs now. Want a glimpse into the crystal ball what that would have been like: just look at the rollout disaster of the Affordable Care Act. They couldn't even keep the website up, lol.
    Reply
  • shrapnel_indie
    <sniff> <sniff> I smell POLITICS involved in how this piece is put together.
    Reply
  • shrapnel_indie
    19614801 said:
    Since when is high speed internet or internet access at all a "right" like a civil right or something? Who says so? The Constitution sure doesn't. Oh sure, the "promote the general welfare"and all that, but the last time I checked, people can live without the internet in their home. There's free WiFi out there just about everywhere and even free computers at public libraries (where public transportation can take you in larger cities if you don't have a car).

    Since people have redefined and exploited parts of the Constitution to include things that were never intended to be issues, let alone covered, by it. So called rights defined by happiness and all that.

    EDIT: I guess by the down-votes, I've hurt someone's feelings... they now need to hurry to their safe space.
    Reply
  • WRXSTIGuy
    19614870 said:
    19614801 said:
    Since when is high speed internet or internet access at all a "right" like a civil right or something? Who says so? The Constitution sure doesn't. Oh sure, the "promote the general welfare"and all that, but the last time I checked, people can live without the internet in their home. There's free WiFi out there just about everywhere and even free computers at public libraries (where public transportation can take you in larger cities if you don't have a car).

    Since people have redefined and exploited parts of the Constitution to include things that were never intended to be issues, let alone covered, by it. So called rights defined by happiness and all that.

    You are correct. The constitution was written to limit the power of a central government, not to give them additional powers.
    Reply
  • Morbus
    Meanwhile, the world laughs.
    /laughs
    Reply