Just Five ChatGPT Queries Can Use 16oz of Water, Say Researchers

Microsoft datacenters for AI
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Researchers from the University of California reckon the growth in popularity of AI might not be without a significant environmental impact. The Associated Press (AP) reported on a preliminary study from the University, which indicates as few as five ChatGPT queries can result in gulping up 500 milliliters of water (roughly a 16-ounce bottle) at Microsoft's Iowa data center. The study also includes indirect water use from other sources associated with the data center, like the power plant that feeds its energy. 

Previously, we have looked with concern at the electricity consumption of hyperscalers like Google, Microsoft, and AWS. We also saw cryptocurrency mining operations push computing energy consumption figures to new highs a few years ago. Water is arguably a more precious resource, but California researchers have had to put unexpected efforts into digging up water consumption figures, with AP characterizing server companies as "secretive" regarding specifics.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • usertests
    Water is neither created nor destroyed. ;)
    Reply
  • vehekos
    This is so ridiculously absurd that has to be fake.
    Not even a million queries should consume that much water.
    Reply
  • ctchewy
    Haven't Microsoft and Google every heard of recirculating water. You know, use water to cool the servers and then use a heat exchanger to cool the water, then send it back to cool the servers? This seems like a rather easy fix to the water consumption problem. Not only that, but you use the waste heat from the heat exchanger to power a turbine and produce electricity for the data center too.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    ctchewy said:
    Haven't Microsoft and Google every heard of recirculating water. You know, use water to cool the servers and then use a heat exchanger to cool the water, then send it back to cool the servers? This seems like a rather easy fix to the water consumption problem. Not only that, but you use the waste heat from the heat exchanger to power a turbine and produce electricity for the data center too.
    Servers often use evaporative cooling to keep the air cool.
    And in order to make those swamp coolers more effective, they like to build giant server farms in the desert where the air is hotter and water is scarce.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I would use ChatGPT less if Google would fix their increasingly useless and apparently easily exploited search algorithms.
    If it's a choice between manually digging through 1,000 AI-generated, sponsored, and ad heavy results or just generating the exact answer I need.... there's really no competition.
    Reply
  • james9701
    What do they mean when they say water is used? Does that mean it runs through a heat exchanger and is dumped into a river? Evaporation pond? Onto the ground? What's the source of the water? How plentiful is water at that source? Evaporation means it precipitates as rain again so it's not really wasted. Deposited on the ground means it recharges an aquifer. Dumped in a river means it's either taken up again further downstream or deposited into a salt water body which can be beneficial or harmful environmentally. The best situation would probably be to use a closed loop system where the water recirculation constantly and the heat is dumped or used elsewhere. That would be more expensive though, probably.
    Using water isn't inherently a bad thing, environmentally speaking. Things like how you source it, how you use/ dispose of it, and how much energy is used matter.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    The estimate includes indirect water usage that the companies don’t measure — such as to cool power plants that supply the data centers with electricity.

    And there goes all credibility for the report right there.
    Reply
  • nitrium
    Giroro said:
    Servers often use evaporative cooling to keep the air cool.
    And in order to make those swamp coolers more effective, they like to build giant server farms in the desert where the air is hotter and water is scarce.
    ^^^ This. Evaporative Cooling is far more cost effective than radiators and giant fans... if you have the water for it. Building these server farms along major rivers (just like nuclear power plants) reduces your cooling costs to near zero.
    Reply
  • Geef
    What a waste!

    A well-made Fremen Stillsuit is so good at recycling its wearer's water, that the wearer would lose only a thimbleful of water a day on a desert world like Arrakis. 😷
    Reply
  • DSzymborski
    Admin said:
    Data centers are causing environmental stress not just due to power demands, but water usage too, with AI services like ChatGPT ramping up consumption.

    Just Five ChatGPT Queries Can Use 16oz of Water, Say Researchers : Read more

    Because as well all know that, like smoke, evaporated water flies into the sky and becomes stars.

    NIMcStAwJ7YView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIMcStAwJ7Y
    Reply