Laptop Makers Face Challenges Moving Production Out of China

Laptop Repair
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Laptop makers are having trouble leaving the shores of China, according to a report by DigiTimes. Dell is singled out as one manufacturer encountering difficulties moving mass production from China to Vietnam after experiencing lower-than-expected production output. Due to these difficulties, which span workforce knowledge, skill, logistics and supply chains, Dell had to delay its plans to start mass production outside China by an entire quarter.

The decision to move production from one place to another isn't taken lightly. The immense costs of infrastructure and relocation pale in comparison to the effort of securing a new supply chain. Because most of the world's trading and fabrication operates close to its maximum output (and contracts are usually multi-year), it's difficult for a new client to secure the required materials while entrenching an already-settled supply chain. Of course, offering more money for the same resources is one sure way of achieving this -- but passing costs on to consumers can impact market share. And there are simply some elements of strategic relocation, such as workforce expertise, that are hard to replicate. 

Despite that, it's a fact that the current geopolitical picture isn't one conducive to trust. The US and China levying economic weapons on each other brings uncertainty to any operations on Chinese soil (especially for US-based companies). Things get especially risky when a country like China can tighten the flow of rare-earth materials and other resources to foreign companies.

This tension and the subsequent lack of confidence in business conditions have been leading the West to try and cement its semiconductor business through new or revised Western-centric supply chains. The push - the idea - is that only a new supply chain beyond the control of China can ensure that materials will keep flowing for businesses. This could cause a new dualistic supply chain: an Eastern and a Western, competing and feeding the same materials through wildly different fabrication specifications. In the end, however, it'll always be a multi-year push: it takes time for even billions of dollars in funding to materialize into new fabrication facilities and their dependencies. We'll do our best to monitor how this evolving strategy pans out.

Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • TechieTwo
    Companies can always find a means to increase the retail price no matter the situation. They never allow a problem to go to waste.
    Reply
  • greenreaper
    It will be worth it, though, and much of the investment will ultimately be kept within the local or regional economy.
    Reply
  • williamcll
    I doubt this would fix their worsening quality over the years.
    Reply
  • WisdomLost
    Why relocate to Vietnam? If you're going to go through the trouble and expense to more your assembly, why not on-shore production closer to the end customers?

    There is a strong case for moving manufacturing out of China, to Mexico and other Central/South American countries. Wages would be similar, and the economic boost would benefit "friendly" nations.

    The easiest way to handle it would be to move assembly plants to Mexico, and establish shipping channels. Later, individual parts suppliers would relocate. Building infrastructure closer to home would take the same path we used to build China's infrastructure and education.

    Existing trade agreements with Mexico, along with their exposure to both Pacific and Atlantic trade, makes it the obvious choice.
    Reply
  • williamcll
    WisdomLost said:
    Why relocate to Vietnam? If you're going to go through the trouble and expense to more your assembly, why not on-shore production closer to the end customers?

    There is a strong case for moving manufacturing out of China, to Mexico and other Central/South American countries. Wages would be similar, and the economic boost would benefit "friendly" nations.

    The easiest way to handle it would be to move assembly plants to Mexico, and establish shipping channels. Later, individual parts suppliers would relocate. Building infrastructure closer to home would take the same path we used to build China's infrastructure and education.

    Existing trade agreements with Mexico, along with their exposure to both Pacific and Atlantic trade, makes it the obvious choice.
    Mexico is far less stable than Vietnam ironically.
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    What a surprise leaving the biggest market in the world is difficult. I forgot which moronic tech CEO it was that recently said he plans to cut China out of his supply chain only to see his sales collapsed faster than he can move the supply chain. When you openly call your customers the enemy don’t be surprised they abandon you
    Reply