Raspberry Pi alternative FriendlyELEC have a history of producing ever more powerful single board computers (SBC) for a variety of applications. Their latest board the NanoPi NEO3, discovered by CNX Software seems to be a small device with which to build network storage applications.
|SoC:||RockChip RK3328, Quad-core 64-bit high-performance Cortex A53|
|LAN:||10/100/1000M Ethernet with unique MAC|
|USB Host:||1x USB3.0 Type A and 2x USB2.0 on 2.54mm pin header|
|MicroSD:||MicroSD x 1 for system boot and storage|
|Fan:||2Pin JST ZH 1.5mm Connector for 5V Fan|
|GPIO:||2.54mm pitch 26 pin-header, include I2C, UART, SPI, I2S, GPIO|
|Power:||5V/1A, via Type-C or GPIO|
|PCB Dimensions:||48 x 48mm (1.89 inch x 1.89 inch)|
|Working Temperature:||-20℃ to 70℃|
The RockChip RK3328 System on Chip (SoC) is quite an old SoC, released in 2016, but it is still a powerful chip for such a small board. Providing a quad core Arm Cortex A53 and MAli-450MP4 GPU, add in 1GB or 2GB of DDR4, USB 3 and USB C power and we have an interesting board, as long as it is cost effective. Network connectivity is limited to a single Gigabit Ethernet port (RTL8211E). There is no HDMI or other video outputs on the board, which means all control is via a remote terminal.
Storage is available via a microSD card slot, sadly there is no space for any SATA or NVME storage options. GPIO access is provided via a 26 pin interface, which features I2C, UART, SPI and I2S. Operating system support is currently an unknown quantity, but it is a good bet that operating systems for other RockChip boards will be compatible.
Based on the size of the board, slightly larger than a Raspberry Pi Zero W, and the power being roughly equal to a Raspberry Pi 3B, we would hope to see this board come in at around $20, with the 2GB model for a few dollars more.
hmmm true tiny network storage.
Clickbait headline. Thanks for nothing.
I know right... I was expecting nvme, sata, or 2.5g ethernet. Any of which may have been an interesting product.
Theres only 125 MegaBytes in a Gigabit (1,000 / 8). The real-world speed of gigabit Ethernet is about 118 MB/S.
Plug in a USB HDD and you have a cheap, very configurable NAS.
Since this devices is designed to be headless, the OS has to come preconfigured for remote access. That could be tricky, particularly for a GUI. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't remote access programs like VNC use the video chip? So no GUI at all?