Quantum Communications Demoed Across Subsea Fiber Optics
Beating records on the path to quantum networks.
For the first time, a research team with the University of York has managed to send unhackable quantum information between Ireland and the UK. Leveraging ultra-low-loss fiber infrastructure capable of carrying "multiple terabits" of information, the researchers demonstrated how photonic qubits can already cover the 224 kilometers between the Irish Sea.
The feat - which included the collaboration of The Quantum Communications Hub and infrastructure provider euNetworks - simultaneously set a new record for longest-distance subsea quantum communication.
It's perhaps sometimes easy to get carried away with the details of new and more powerful Quantum Processing Units (QPUs), or clever new ways of using quantum engineering to use the subatomic world as our calculators. But perhaps the best measure of a technology lies in how it's actually applied, rather than idealized; and the reality is that quantum communication is already being tested over commercial-grade optical fiber infrastructure. And if there's something we know from our own PC world, it's that compatibility too can be key.
Quantum communications takes advantage of the property of quantum entanglement - where two qubits become linked across distance, and where you can't describe one without also describing the other. The issue with entangled quantum states, however, is that they're fickle and prone to failure - their useful states can be collapsed through any outside interference, including any attempts at pulling data from them. This instability is why a qubit traversing a partly underwater, 224 kilometer distance within a high-tech fiber-optics cable is so impressive. Back in 2021, quantum communication had already been shown across 660 kilometers - but there were no high-pressure water bodies in the way.
The research serves as a reminder of how far along quantum communications already are towards commercialization. The cable bit should be one of the lesser problems: Rockabill, whose fiber optics elements are composed of Corning glass, was installed back in 2019. At the time, it was indeed among the latest and greatest available, but technology has since advanced. Considering how it took only eight months for Rockabill to be installed, however, it doesn't seem that quantum-compatible infrastructure will be the bottleneck - it's simply the case that we are already using it for other purposes.
Rockabill being a fraction of the euNetworks' Super Highway web of fiber-optics connections means that infrastructure is already ahead of the quantum curve. It's more likely that any bottleneck will lie at the ends of the fibre optics, in the field of sensors, their sizes, reliability, ease of manufacturing, and ultimately, cost.
“Many large companies and organizations are interested in quantum communications to secure their data, but it has limitations, particularly the distance it can travel,” said research lead Professor Marco Lucamarini. “The longer the distance, the more likely it is that the photon – the particles of light that we use as carriers of quantum information – are lost, absorbed or scattered in the channel, which reduces the chances of the information reaching its target. This presents a problem when organizations need to send private digital information to other cities or other countries, where the additional challenge could also be an ocean between the communications’ start and end point.”
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.
-
purpleduggy incredible. looking forward to entanglement networks reducing latency to sub 5ms globally.Reply -
George³
You would have to travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum if the source of the signal is half an equator away from you, as a receiver.purpleduggy said:incredible. looking forward to entanglement networks reducing latency to sub 5ms globally. -
chiron40k Asides from secure data transfer, what other benefits does quantum communication provide & how?Reply -
bit_user
From what I've read, you can't use quantum entaglement for faster-than-light communications:purpleduggy said:incredible. looking forward to entanglement networks reducing latency to sub 5ms globally.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Quantum_mechanics
Perhaps wormholes are the best chance to break the speed of light - for communication, at least?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Spacetime_distortion -
bit_user I think a somewhat critical detail was omitted from this article, @Francisco Alexandre Pires . Your earlier article explains that:Reply
"The research finally opens the door to long distance Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). QKD is essentially a distribution protocol for encryption keys, albeit based on quantum physics - and is being hailed as the final frontier in encryption schemas. This "final frontier of security" is being touted on the basis of quantum physics, and the behavior of qubits, themselves: after data has been encrypted with a secure QKD key, it can then be sent over an insecure connection (such as the internet), where only the holders of the decryption key can access its contents."
This way, entanglement merely has to last long enough for the encryption key to be sent. I assume that's still the idea? -
George³ The speed of light inside the fiber is 2.14 x 108m/s.Then + 2 times translate between electric and light and packing, unpacking, compressing, decompressing. A lot of latencies.Reply -
bit_user
Yeah, I think @purpleduggy was clearly hoping quantum entaglement would enable faster-than-light communications. Sadly, it seems too good to be true. If it did, one could build a computer the size of the universe!George³ said:The speed of light inside the fiber is 2.14 x 108m/s.Then + 2 times translate between electric and light and packing, unpacking, compressing, decompressing. A lot of latencies.
: D -
purpleduggy
true, but most of the 90ms latency between EU and US is not a result of the speed of light limitations, its a result of additional hops and inefficient infrastructure in between that quantum entanglement can solve. the entanglement regardless of distance aspect is hugely beneficial even if it runs at just half of the speed of light. also dual or quad links can be used to multiply the throughput even if limited by the speed of light.bit_user said:From what I've read, you can't use quantum entaglement for faster-than-light communications:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Quantum_mechanics
Perhaps wormholes are the best chance to break the speed of light - for communication, at least?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light#Spacetime_distortion -
bit_user
If you think about it, infrastructure really doesn't want to add latency, because that requires some form of RAM to buffer the packets. When you're talking about Terrabit/s links, adding 1 ms of latency means a Gigabit of buffering, but you need to simultaneously read & write the buffer memory at terrabit speeds (125 GB/s, duplex). That means it either needs to be on-die or like HBM - either of which gets expensive.purpleduggy said:true, but most of the 90ms latency between EU and US is not a result of the speed of light limitations, its a result of additional hops and inefficient infrastructure in between
To minimize the amount of memory needed, they have an incentive to do as little buffering as possible. I'd wager most or all of the backbone equipment operates in cut-through mode, rather than store-and-forward. It's not only lower-cost and lower-latency, but also more energy-efficient.