Quantum computing stocks tank as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang predicts the tech won't be viable for another 20 years — stocks fell more than 40% for a total market value loss of over $8 billion

Nvidia Blackwell and GTC 2024
(Image credit: Nvidia)

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang purportedly was responsible for tanking quantum computing stocks on Wednesday after a claim he had made about quantum computers' usefulness. Reuters reports that Jensen Huang believes quantum computer usefulness will only truly take place in 20 years, tanking several quantum computing stocks by more than 40%.

According to Reuters, Jensen Huang claimed on Tuesday, "If you kind of said 15 years... that'd probably be on the early side. If you said 30, it's probably on the late side. But if you picked 20, I think a whole bunch of us would believe it."

Jensen's statement alone caused Rigetti Computing (RGTI.O), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS.N), Quantum Computing (QUBT.O), and IonQ (IONQ.N), stock to fall more than 40%, combining for a lost market value of over $8 billion.

Apparently, the Nvidia CEO is not the only person with this view of quantum computers. Reuters reveals that Ivana Delevska, an investment chief of Spear Invest, holds the same views, saying the 15 to 20-year timeline "seems very realistic." It is the same amount of time Nvidia took to develop accelerated computing.

The Nvidia CEO's far-away viability claim on quantum computing comes as the technology has reached an inflection point in functionality and effectiveness. Just a few months ago, Chinese scientists could crack military-grade encryption, some of the world's highest and most complex encryption, with D-Wave quantum computers.

Quantum computers are also breaking new records. Google's new Willow quantum computing chip can solve a workload that would take a classical computer 10 septillion years to complete. Last month, China unveiled the fastest quantum computer the country has built, featuring 504 qubits of performance.

Quantum computing is still in its infancy, similar to the 1980s and 1990s of classical computing development. Only time will tell whether it will take 20 years to mature enough for mainstream use, as Huang has predicted.

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    And they'll both likely see decent gains in the coming days, a classic short seller attack.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    And they'll both likely see decent gains in the coming days, a classic short seller attack.
    I agree in the short term. However, long term I agree with the idea that it's way to early to pick quantum stocks. Fells a lot like the Solid State Battery crazy from 2015/2016 where people in the industry were saying they are decades away at large scale but the stocks were being run up anyway.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    LOL at anyone listening to him on this. He's hardly a disinterested party.

    Was this a direct answer to a question about QC, or did that just come out of left field? If the latter, then the fact that he took that initiative should tell us he views QC as a threat.
    Reply
  • paviko
    I thought in 3-5 years AGI or SAI was going to take the world thanks to NVidia GPUs and Quantum Computer would be "made by" them. Someone forgot something... OpenAI or NVidia?
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    bit_user said:
    Was this a direct answer to a question about QC, or did that just come out of left field? If the latter, then the fact that he too that initiative should tell us he views QC as a threat.
    It was during a Q&A session, he was asked about how useful he thought QC would be in the near term and how it could impact Nvidia.

    https://www.constellationr.com/blog-news/insights/here-s-what-nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-said-about-quantum-computing-project-digits
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    So can I tank Nvidia stock by saying "ai" has no profitable future and the end goal of general intelligent is multiple decades away at earliest if ever?
    Reply
  • ccc1234
    to bad Nvidia is already old technology hello quantum goodbye Nvidia the turtle (Nvidia) vs the rabbit (Rigetti or D-wave) and the rabbit wins this race it was fun while it lasted Nvidia or never started Rigetti or D-wave makes Nvidia look like the Apple lle from the 80s or The Flintstones
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    hotaru251 said:
    So can I tank Nvidia stock by saying "ai" has no profitable future and the end goal of general intelligent is multiple decades away at earliest if ever?
    No. People would have to care what you have to say for that to work.
    Reply
  • LibertyWell
    ccc1234 said:
    to bad Nvidia is already old technology hello quantum goodbye Nvidia the turtle (Nvidia) vs the rabbit (Rigetti or D-wave) and the rabbit wins this race it was fun while it lasted Nvidia or never started Rigetti or D-wave makes Nvidia look like the Apple lle from the 80s or The Flintstones
    Elon Musk: AI is summoning the demon.

    DWave Founder: Through AI, Lovecraftian Old Ones are being summoned in the background and no one is paying attention and if we’re not careful it’s going to wipe us all out.
    Reply
  • LibertyWell
    JamesJones44 said:
    It was during a Q&A session, he was asked about how useful he thought QC would be in the near term and how it could impact Nvidia.

    https://www.constellationr.com/blog-news/insights/here-s-what-nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-said-about-quantum-computing-project-digits
    It’s trivial to plant “questions” like that. Even Q/As have scripted questions, there’s too much at stake not to do this.
    Reply