Microsoft inks deal to restart Three Mile Island nuclear reactor to fuel its voracious AI ambitions

Three Mile Island
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Modern AI data centers consume enormous amounts of power, and it looks like they will get even more power-hungry in the coming years as companies like Google, Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI strive towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). Oracle has already outlined plans to use nuclear power plants for its 1-gigawatt datacenters. It looks like Microsoft plans to do the same as it just inked a deal to restart a nuclear power plant to feed its data centers, reports Bloomberg. 

819 MW for AI and cloud data centers 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Crazyy8
    As long as the old 3 mile island management isn't running the 2nd reactor, I'm totally fine with this. Nuclear all the way!
    Reply
  • Flemkopf
    Forty-five years since the Three Mile Island accident. While I've historically been a fan of nuclear power, is Microsoft going to be in this for the long haul? The maintenance and regulatory burden is just second to none, and that's before you get into public opposition like Vermont Yankee fought for decades. Nuclear power isn't like the abandoned-in-place fiber optic over-expansion from the dot com boom. Vermont Yankee shut down in 2014 and is finally nearing full decommissioning in the next two years.

    This just sounds like the sort of wild idea that pops out there at the end of a bubble before everything finally comes back down to earth. What's the backup plan for Three mile when Microsoft eventually backs out two to five years from now?
    Reply
  • chaz_music
    I have been wondering for a while when people are going to recognize that the big AI rollout and its energy consumption is going to raise our utility bills, just like EV charging already is.

    On another note: Microsoft will learn about the NRC and their lack of help for power plants. They regulate, but almost never help with problems.
    Reply
  • DS426
    So MS is going to put the shackles on Constellation by making it private-only? I take this as MS really expects this datacenter to eat 900-1000 MW rather consistently.

    On the other hand, I take it that Constellation's backup plan if MS bails out is to put it up as a publicly-accessible utility. Even with EV growth slowing down, we need new power to come online as coal plants are being shut down (not all are being converted to nat gas).
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    I remember a time when everyone was concerned about the power usage for mining crypto currencies.
    Now we are adding this on top of that.

    I wonder what they will come up next? In the end it all centers around CPU/GPU, so the next big thing has to be another CPU/GPU "invention".
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    Are we sure TMI Unit 1 is still considered clean energy? I had thought part of the reason it shut down was due to its old design and the amount of radioactive waste it produced. I'm not sure whether to congratulate Microsoft or scorn them.
    Reply
  • Unolocogringo
    :homer:
    Microsoft running a Nuclear Power Plant.
    I hope it runs on some form of Linux at least.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I have a question about this that I don't know have been fully hammered out yet in these initial stages.

    By restart do they mean turning back on an antique reactor from 50 years ago

    or

    By "restart" are they using the word in a somewhat loaded way meaning that there will be a new more efficient and also reliable reactor core that's only a few years old? The kind of reactor that wouldn't do what happened all those years ago on the island?

    I probably missed it, but has anybody seen the meaning behind the word "restart" in this regard?
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    ezst036 said:
    I have a question about this that I don't know have been fully hammered out yet in these initial stages.

    By restart do they mean turning back on an antique reactor from 50 years ago

    or

    By "restart" are they using the word in a somewhat loaded way meaning that there will be a new more efficient and also reliable reactor core that's only a few years old? The kind of reactor that wouldn't do what happened all those years ago on the island?

    I probably missed it, but has anybody seen the meaning behind the word "restart" in this regard?
    Read the article, not just the headline. The answers to your questions lie within...
    Reply
  • lxh89
    Perhaps they'll let AI take control of the nuclear power plant, what could possibly go wrong.
    Reply