Danish Navy reportedly boards Chinese ship suspected in European undersea cable sabotage — Sweden’s Defense Ministry put freighter at the time and place of the disruption

HDMS Hvidbjorne off the coast of Greenland
(Image credit: Gordon Leggett)

Update 11/20/2024 03:38 PT: The Danish Navy has boarded and detained the Chinese Bulk Carrier Yi Peng 3 in the Danish Straits, near the exit of the Great Belt, according to reports in Eurasia Daily and Defence24. The detention reportedly took place on the evening of November 18. Officials have not verified those reports, however. According to Financial Times sources, Swedish authorities are "carefully studying the Chinese vessel."

Original Article:

Denmark has sent two ships, the HDMS Hvidbjoernen, an ocean patrol frigate, and the DNK Navy Patrol P525, a smaller patrol craft, to shadow the Chinese Bulk Carrier Yi Peng 3. Authorities suspect the Chinese vessel is connected with the cutting of two undersea internet cables that connect Finland and Sweden to Central Europe, reports MSN.

The undersea cable connecting Sweden to Lithuania was the first to be hit, sustaining damage around Sunday, Nov. 17; the Finland-Germany undersea cable was cut the following day. On Tuesday, the Sweden Ministry of Civil Defense announced that it had recorded the Yi Peng 3’s movements and placed it within the vicinity of possible sabotage events.

According to public records, the bulk carrier left Ust-Luga Anchorage, some 50 miles east of St. Petersburg in Russia, on Nov. 15, and its next destination was Port Said in Egypt. We don’t have any information on her crew or what type of cargo she’s carrying, though.

At the time of writing, Marinetraffic.com puts the Chinese ship in the middle of the Kattegatt, the sea bound by Denmark on the west and Sweden in the east. The smaller Danish patrol ship is immediately beside it, while the Hvidbjoernen is located some 15 to 20 miles southwest of the two vessels (although the website says that this position was last updated more than seven hours ago).

Sweden says that it has already dispatched units to the scene of the cut undersea cables to examine the damage and that its police are already investigating the incident. The action of the Danish ships is likely part of a coordinated effort to determine how and why the undersea cables were cut, especially as authorities are crying sabotage.

This comes just a few months after NATO said that Russia was mapping undersea fiber optic cables as part of its strategy to disrupt communications. While the involved ship is flagged by China, the two countries are, if not exactly allies, at least friendly on friendly terms. Last year, another Chinese cargo ship reportedly dragged an anchor for "hundreds of kilometers," thus damaging a gas pipeline in the Baltic that connects Finland and Estonia. Finland contends the incident was intentional.

The events in the Baltic Sea regarding the suspected sabotage of the undersea cables are developing, but we hope this does not become a wider conflict. After all, undersea communications cable goes beyond just providing internet to the general people; it could also carry crucial military and government messaging. This is especially important for Finland, which shares a border with Russia, and Lithuania, which is located north of Belarus — the same country from which Putin launched the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • AngelusF
    Llithuania also shares a border with Russian territory
    Reply
  • ex_bubblehead
    A warning to all. Politics are banned in the discussion threads. If anyone dares go there the consequences will be severe.
    Reply
  • pug_s
    I think there's some misleading things in this article. 1) This is pure speculation at this point so we shouldn't make assumptions that the Chinese are the culprits. 2)The picture in the article is the HDMS Hvidbjørnen (F360), not the Chinese cargo ship which typically looks like this. 3) The ship in question was made in China doesn't mean that the ship is manned by a Chinese crew here.
    Reply
  • gg83
    Seems a little sus to me.
    Reply
  • EzzyB
    pug_s said:
    I think there's some misleading things in this article. 1) This is pure speculation at this point so we shouldn't make assumptions that the Chinese are the culprits. 2)The picture in the article is the HDMS Hvidbjørnen (F360), not the Chinese cargo ship which typically looks like this. 3) The ship in question was made in China doesn't mean that the ship is manned by a Chinese crew here.
    The key here is not where the ship was manufactured, but where it's flagged. It is extremely common for carriers to use what is called a Flag of Convenience. This is done to register ships in a country that has more relaxed regulations than it's home country. There are, for instance, very few US flagged commercial carriers because that ship would be subject to US safety and labor laws.

    I'm not sure if it's at all common to use China as a Flag of Convenience, but it's possible the ship is owned and operated by a non-Chinese entity.
    Reply
  • GreyOmega4k
    pug_s said:
    I think there's some misleading things in this article. 3) The ship in question was made in China doesn't mean that the ship is manned by a Chinese crew here.

    Chinese commercial ships are typically predominantly crewed by non-Chinese with Chinese overseers in charge. As they can underpay and overwork non-Chinese workers on the ships. In this case the ship is owned by Ningbo Yipeng Shipping which is based near the Chinese port city of Ningbo. VesselFinder has the ship as being renamed and Chinese flagged at least as far back as Nov 2016.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    Other reporting explained that the ship had a Russian captain, had left a Russian port and was present at two places seperate places where cables were cut.
    Reply
  • ex_bubblehead
    As we still have a rather large contingent of users that think that they can flout the rules as they wish this thread is now closed. Thank you once again to those that actually follow the rules and stayed on topic.
    Reply