TP-Link under DOJ investigation for alleged predatory pricing practices and national security concerns

TP Link
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

The U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly opened an inquiry into TP-Link, the largest consumer router provider in the country, for unfair pricing practices and whether it poses a threat to national security.

TP-Link is known for its affordable home networking products and has reportedly cornered 65% of this market. According to Bloomberg, the DOJ is investigating whether the company achieved this through predatory pricing, wherein it sells goods at a loss to obtain a monopoly. Once it achieves that goal, it would significantly raise its prices to maximize profits at the expense of the consumer.

Aside from the Justice Department’s probe, the U.S. Department of Commerce is also looking into whether TP-Link’s Chinese connections affect the country’s national security, especially with the brand’s popularity among home users. This investigation began in late 2024, especially as the company got tied to Salt Typhoon cyberattacks allegedly backed by Beijing.

TOPICS
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • A Stoner
    It is not hard to undercut the prices of competitors when the competitors are selling wifi units for thousands of dollars.

    Netgear Orbi 3 pack for $1800 and additional satellites $700. At those kinds of prices, of course there is going to be undercutting. And no, I do not think they are taking a loss!
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    investigating whether the company achieved this through predatory pricing, wherein it sells goods at a loss to obtain a monopoly. Once it achieves that goal, it would significantly raise its prices to maximize profits at the expense of the consumer.

    ....if they even try this might as well also go after PSN/MS & other big names who have all sold at a loss for many yrs just to gain userbase and then raised prices :|
    Reply
  • wakuwaku
    I think the main issue is that all these upper echelons in the USA do not do any real research. They just: CHINA!!! NOPE!!!.

    While TP-Link is cheaper than higher end brands, but thats the point. They are just cheaper. In fact with TP-Link pricing I would consider them a middle tier brand, not really a cheap good value for money brand. There are cheaper China good for value money brands out there compared to TP-Link, that if TP-Link is suspicious, then what about those brands then that undercut TP-Link while offering the same or better hardware and software and warranty package with their networking gear.

    These Americans seriously need to properly look through their Best Buys and Walmarts and Microcenters and Amazons. Not just read Tom's Hardware that only review rich people stuff.
    Reply
  • jlake3
    Kinda baffled how they plan to make “unfair pricing practices” stick. They’re not the absolute cheapest routers you can buy, but while (in my experience/opinion) they are the lowest price option with a reliable brick-and-mortar presence and the kind of corporate presence to match, they’re not that much cheaper than Asus, while Netgear can be kinda out-to-lunch on pricing.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    After having looked at SBC routers and the offerings from small companies like Gl.iNet it seems safe to say TP-Link is only cheaper than the likes of Asus/Netgear because they have lower profit margins. Netgear could have still been king of the castle if they didn't have such outlandish pricing most of the time.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Yeah, I echo the sentiments here.
    TP-link only seems cheaper because everyone else is astronomical.

    The only real concern with TP-link is firmware update frequency, product lifetime support, and any security issues that crop up between them.
    I'm surprised Asus still regularly updates the firmware for my AC68U.
    Reply
  • redboy66
    That market is too competitive to maintain a monopoly and raise prices.
    Today's share could plummet if prices are raised.
    Reply
  • magbarn
    A Stoner said:
    It is not hard to undercut the prices of competitors when the competitors are selling wifi units for thousands of dollars.

    Netgear Orbi 3 pack for $1800 and additional satellites $700. At those kinds of prices, of course there is going to be undercutting. And no, I do not think they are taking a loss!
    I agree. How in the hell do WiFi routers cost more than full Blown PC’s with monitors? That’s some serious profit or poor BOM costs.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    A Stoner said:
    It is not hard to undercut the prices of competitors when the competitors are selling wifi units for thousands of dollars.

    Netgear Orbi 3 pack for $1800 and additional satellites $700. At those kinds of prices, of course there is going to be undercutting. And no, I do not think they are taking a loss!

    It's easy to undercut the competition when they do all the R&D for you and you just clone their products. There, fixed it for you.
    Reply
  • George³
    JamesJones44 said:
    when they do all the R&D for you
    Is this true? Netgear make and spend for all r&d and cheaper trademarks make clones?
    Reply