TP-Link under DOJ investigation for alleged predatory pricing practices and national security concerns
Is TP-Link undercutting its competitors by selling at a loss?

The U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly opened an inquiry into TP-Link, the largest consumer router provider in the country, for unfair pricing practices and whether it poses a threat to national security.
TP-Link is known for its affordable home networking products and has reportedly cornered 65% of this market. According to Bloomberg, the DOJ is investigating whether the company achieved this through predatory pricing, wherein it sells goods at a loss to obtain a monopoly. Once it achieves that goal, it would significantly raise its prices to maximize profits at the expense of the consumer.
Aside from the Justice Department’s probe, the U.S. Department of Commerce is also looking into whether TP-Link’s Chinese connections affect the country’s national security, especially with the brand’s popularity among home users. This investigation began in late 2024, especially as the company got tied to Salt Typhoon cyberattacks allegedly backed by Beijing.
TP-Link Systems, based in Irvine, California, is the company behind the routers in the U.S. It was previously owned by TP-LINK Technologies, a Shenzhen, China-based corporation, and only fully established itself as an independent organization in October 2024. The company says it is unaware of any inquiry.
"To date, TP-Link Systems Inc. has not received any inquiry from the Department of Justice regarding these matters. As a U.S.-based company, TP-Link operates with the utmost integrity and transparency, and stands ready to cooperate fully with any government inquiries, should they arise," a spokesman tells Tom's Hardware.
The company claims that its products have been manufactured in its factory in Vietnam since 2018, ensuring that it has control over its supply chain. Still, U.S. officials are concerned about whether the corporate restructuring is enough to insulate it from meddling by the Chinese government, with some experts claiming that it still has a broad presence in mainland China.
"Unlike competitors, TP-Link owns its manufacturing and R&D operations, enabling cost savings and enhanced control over the security of our vertically integrated supply chain," the spokesman told us. "We do not sell products below cost and maintain a policy of transparency in our business practices, ensuring fair pricing for our valued customers."
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Investigations like these could take months, if not years, to conclude, and they do not always lead to prosecution. Aside from the criminal proceedings, the DOJ also launched a parallel civil investigation, Bloomberg reported.
The Federal government is apparently doing this to hedge its bets, as Bloomberg says that criminal prosecution of predatory pricing is rather complicated — the government must prove that the company is selling at a loss and that it will recoup its losses by jacking up prices when it has a monopoly on the market. Civil cases have a lower evidentiary requirement, making it easier for the Justice Department to win its case.
If proven guilty, TP-Link could be fined up to a maximum of $100 million. Furthermore, its executives could be slapped with a $1 million penalty, plus possible imprisonment of up to 10 years.
The government actively pursued antitrust cases during the Biden administration, with Nvidia and Google being scrutinized. This policy has continued under Trump’s leadership, with Director of Criminal Enforcement Emma Burnham of the DOJ Antitrust Division saying that the agency will focus on companies and individuals, including “everyday products we all rely on, as well as for vital goods and services the government needs to ensure our national security and provide critical infrastructure.”
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
A Stoner It is not hard to undercut the prices of competitors when the competitors are selling wifi units for thousands of dollars.Reply
Netgear Orbi 3 pack for $1800 and additional satellites $700. At those kinds of prices, of course there is going to be undercutting. And no, I do not think they are taking a loss! -
hotaru251 investigating whether the company achieved this through predatory pricing, wherein it sells goods at a loss to obtain a monopoly. Once it achieves that goal, it would significantly raise its prices to maximize profits at the expense of the consumer.
....if they even try this might as well also go after PSN/MS & other big names who have all sold at a loss for many yrs just to gain userbase and then raised prices :| -
wakuwaku I think the main issue is that all these upper echelons in the USA do not do any real research. They just: CHINA!!! NOPE!!!.Reply
While TP-Link is cheaper than higher end brands, but thats the point. They are just cheaper. In fact with TP-Link pricing I would consider them a middle tier brand, not really a cheap good value for money brand. There are cheaper China good for value money brands out there compared to TP-Link, that if TP-Link is suspicious, then what about those brands then that undercut TP-Link while offering the same or better hardware and software and warranty package with their networking gear.
These Americans seriously need to properly look through their Best Buys and Walmarts and Microcenters and Amazons. Not just read Tom's Hardware that only review rich people stuff. -
jlake3 Kinda baffled how they plan to make “unfair pricing practices” stick. They’re not the absolute cheapest routers you can buy, but while (in my experience/opinion) they are the lowest price option with a reliable brick-and-mortar presence and the kind of corporate presence to match, they’re not that much cheaper than Asus, while Netgear can be kinda out-to-lunch on pricing.Reply -
thestryker After having looked at SBC routers and the offerings from small companies like Gl.iNet it seems safe to say TP-Link is only cheaper than the likes of Asus/Netgear because they have lower profit margins. Netgear could have still been king of the castle if they didn't have such outlandish pricing most of the time.Reply