Intel Disputes CPU Bug Claims

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • benbennett
    Directly from AMD

    "AMD processors are not subject to the types of attacks that the kernel
    page table isolation feature protects against. The AMD microarchitecture
    does not allow memory references, including speculative references, that
    access higher privileged data when running in a lesser privileged mode
    when that access would result in a page fault.

    Disable page table isolation by default on AMD processors by not setting
    the X86_BUG_CPU_INSECURE feature, which controls whether X86_FEATURE_PTI
    is set."
    Reply
  • jpwalters1
    Though the doomsday scenario may be overblown, you must also consider that Intel has a vested interest in downplaying the impact if any, as well as implicating as many other competitors as possible. I think we need to wait and see.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    Hang on, what windows tests? almost every single test posted online abvout the patch was of linux.

    Also the language you're using in both articles almost seems like you were paid to protect intel.

    Also the intel verbiage seems to be trying to claim other processors have this flaw, which AMD said its false.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    20555002 said:
    Hang on, what windows tests? almost every single test posted online abvout the patch was of linux.

    Also the language you're using in both articles almost seems like you were paid to protect intel.

    Also the intel verbiage seems to be trying to claim other processors have this flaw, which AMD said its false.

    The Windows tests are linked in the text. https://www.computerbase.de/2018-01/intel-cpu-pti-sicherheitsluecke/

    AMD has not released a statement about the vulnerabilities.

    ARM disclosed a few minutes ago that it also is subject to the vulnerability. The company claims the vulnerability is not the the result of "Architectural flaws."

    We will update the post when AMD makes an official statement.
    Reply
  • milkton
    "this implies the exploit can read data" It's just me but imagine what CIA could have done with this all over the world. But I'm sure CIA didn't have idea about this... or maybe not?
    Reply
  • vapour
    making popcorn...
    Reply
  • silverwolf.bwc
    Haha, where's your post patching Benchmarks? Until you complete those and publish them, all this smacks of paid protection of Intel stock prices.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    20555121 said:
    Haha, where's your post patching Benchmarks? Until you complete those and publish them, all this smacks of paid protection of Intel stock prices.

    https://www.computerbase.de/2018-01/intel-cpu-pti-sicherheitsluecke/

    These are preliminary results. Computerbase.de has a solid history of accurate test methodology.
    Reply
  • ldcsteelers
    What about Cloud providers? They must be shaking in their shoes. Customer A can use this exploit to read data from Customer B.
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    Yep the bug is real and by early estimates there’s a huge 30% cpu penalty to fix this hardware flaw, OS doesn’t matter

    Good thing I have my Ryzen
    Reply