Page 1:Finding Value In Higher Quality
Page 2:CPU, Cooler, And Memory
Page 3:Graphics, Motherboard, And Power Supply
Page 4:Case And Drives
Page 5:Assembling Our $2000 Performance PC
Page 6:Getting Our Core i7-3930K To 4.6 GHz
Page 7:Pushing GeForce GTX 670 To Its Limit
Page 8:Test Settings And Benchmarks
Page 9:Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
Page 10:Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3 And DiRT 3
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Skyrim And StarCraft II
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
Page 14:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 15:Power, Heat, And Efficiency
Page 16:Sometimes, Lower Value Is OK
CPU, Cooler, And Memory
CPU: Intel Core i7-3930K
Most of our System Builder Marathon configurations reflect the back and forth arguments between two camps: more CPU and more GPU. Any time we shift our focus to one, the benchmarking dynamic changes. We hear the folks who want more than a mainstream Ivy Bridge-based chip in our highest-end machine. However, we also know that not all of our tests take advantage of more than four cores, limiting the utility we'll see in the performance results.
On the other hand, the resolutions we're using to compare machines are too low to justify a massive graphics subsystem. We'd need a triple-screen setup to really tax the benefit of two or three GeForce GTX 670s, for example.
And so we're back with a six-core Hyper-Threaded Intel Core i7-3930K, a CPU that gives us most of the performance of the flagship Core i7-3960X, but at slightly more than half its cost.
Cooler: Scythe Mugen 3 Rev. B
As we got closer to the top of our budget, we realized that our first choice in a CPU cooler simply wouldn’t make it into this month’s build, nor would its award-winning competitor. Instead, we needed to find a solution for around $50 with similar cooling performance, noise be damned. Unfortunately, we hadn't yet reviewed anything with that combination of low cost and prowess.
This is where Newegg’s buyer reviews came in handy. Knowing what defines a good design, we compared all of the available sub-$60 coolers with the surface area needed to satisfy our demands. We then checked our forums, along with the forums of a couple overclocking communities. All of those considerations narrowed our search to two products, and Scythe’s part number SCMG-3100 was the one that fit our motherboard.
Memory: G.Skill Ares DDR3-1600 CAS 8 16 GB
All of today's desktop processors have integrated memory controllers, and most builders know enough to pick their memory based on their CPU's specs. But what about picking memory based on a CPU cooler?
We figured out a few quarters ago that G.Skill’s Ares kit uses the same modules as its award-winning Ripjaws series, so long as you compare parts with the same rating. The difference is in the heat spreader, and the Ares modules are short enough to fit underneath the fans of many oversized CPU coolers. Really, these modules run cool enough that they don’t usually need big heat spreaders.
G.Skill’s 16 GB part number F3-1600C8Q-16GAB looks just like its 8 GB counterpart, but has two more modules on the other side of its info card.
- Finding Value In Higher Quality
- CPU, Cooler, And Memory
- Graphics, Motherboard, And Power Supply
- Case And Drives
- Assembling Our $2000 Performance PC
- Getting Our Core i7-3930K To 4.6 GHz
- Pushing GeForce GTX 670 To Its Limit
- Test Settings And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: 3DMark And PCMark
- Benchmark Results: SiSoftware Sandra
- Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3 And DiRT 3
- Benchmark Results: Skyrim And StarCraft II
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- Sometimes, Lower Value Is OK