Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Radeon HD 4770s In CrossFire

ATI Radeon HD 4770 In CrossFire: Unbeatable At $220
By

So how much graphics muscle are you really getting for $220, and how does that compare to the competing single-GPU solutions?

Two Radeon HD 4770s give you 1,280 total shader processors, two 512 MB GDDR5 frame buffers (each on a 128-bit bus), 32 total ROPs and the ability to filter up to 64 textured pixels per clock. Each board in the CrossFire configuration runs a 750 MHz core clock and memory at 800 MHz—effectively 3,200 MT/s.

Why is CrossFire so gosh-darned viable right now? For several generations of chipsets dating back to the 955X Express, Intel platforms have supported the multi-card rendering technology. AMD chipsets dating back to the Radeon Xpress 200 also extend support. So, there’s a huge install base of core logic and motherboards that are compatible.

In contrast, Nvidia has historically limited its SLI technology to Nvidia’s own AMD-/Intel-based chipsets. It was only recently made available on another vendor’s platform via licensing (Intel’s X58). Clearly, Nvidia is realizing that a protectionist policy isn’t the way to go. In fact, we even heard of one motherboard vendor whose budget X58 boards originally didn’t support SLI, were BIOS-hacked to enable it, and then worked-through with Nvidia on a proper implementation—all without having to pay for the license!

How about the oft-mentioned (by Nvidia) concern that, because ATI doesn’t have as close a relationship with game developers—specifically those involved in its TWIMTBP program—that CrossFire is riddled with compatibility issues? There’s actually some validity to such a worry, especially if you enjoy picking up games as soon as they're released. We've seen titles, such as FEAR 2, where CrossFire compatibility is specifically listed as a known issue. Fallout 3 with quad-GPU CrossFire can also be problematic, according to ATI's own Catalyst release notes.

At the same time, none of the games in our test suite gave us trouble. CrossFire isn’t perfect, but after seeing what a pair of 4770s can do slung together, you’ll want to reconsider your reservations.


Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4870
Radeon HD 4770 CrossFire
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260 C216
Manufacturing Process55 nm TSMC55 nm TSMC40 nm TSMC65 nm TSMC55 / 65 nm TSMC
SPs800
800640 x 2
240
216
Core Clock850 MHz750 MHz
750 MHz602 MHz
576 MHz
Shader Clock850 MHz750 MHz750 MHz1,296 MHz
1,242 MHz
Memory Clock975 MHz GDDR5
900 MHz GDDR5
800 MHz GDDR51,107 MHz GDDR3
999 MHz GDDR3
Frame Buffer1 GB
1 GB / 512 MB
512 MB x 2
1 GB
896 MB
Memory Bus Width256-bit
256-bit
128-bit x 2
512-bit
448-bit
ROPs16
16
16 x 2
32
28
Price~$250
~$190~$220
~$310
~$180


Power And Heat

The Radeon HD 4770 earned praise for its 40 nm technology and resulting cut in power consumption. Indeed, it uses the least power at idle and under load of any other graphics card we tested here.

But what happens when you add a second board in CrossFire? As expected, power consumption jumps significantly. At idle, the two 4770s use more power than any of the single-GPU solutions. Under load, however, the 40 nm RV740 retains its advantage and ducks in under the Radeon HD 4890 and Radeon HD 4870 1 GB cards, using more power than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216.

If you were looking for more information on the 40 nm process’ effect on GPU temperature, here you go. These were all measured through GPU-z after 10 minutes of idle and then a series of looped 1920x1200 Crysis runs in a window.

You can see that a lone Radeon HD 4770 is the coolest of ATI’s cards at both idle and under full load. Interestingly enough, though, each board required a slightly different fan speed in order to achieve its temperatures. We'll see if these results correspond to overclocking in just a bit.

React To This Article