I built a PC With MSI's Project Zero Motherboard: Moving all the ports to the back for a cleaner, quicker build with better airflow

MSI Project Zero Motherboard
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In case you haven't heard, multiple motherboard makers have been busy designing boards that move all of the typical data, power, fan and RGB headers and connectors to the back of the motherboard, making for an ultra-clean PC interior. Theoretically, at least, it should also allow for better airflow because there are no cables in the case to cause turbulence.

Maingear holds the patent for this layout in the United States. But Asus is partnering with Lian Li and XPG (among others) and seems to have settled on the name BTF (Back to Future). Gigabyte, partnering with Maingear, launched its Project Stealth in 2022. And now MSI (also in partnership with Maingear) is offering up its own take, dubbed Project Zero, which encompasses a few motherboard models and a Pano M100R PZ case.

In advance of CES next week, MSI sent us its B650M Project Zero AMD motherboard $229, the previously mentioned Pano M100R PZ case ($109), its MAG CoreLiquid 240R V2 AIO cooler, and an A850GL PCIE5 power supply ($119 for the black model, though the white model we were sent isn't yet available in the US). I used these parts, along with some others, to build a mostly white system. The nearly cable-free system interior looks great once the system is built. And in many ways, having all the connections at the back makes plugging things in easier. But moving all the cables at the back introduces its own complications. Plus, having a board with a bunch of easily bent pins on the back makes it awkward to handle until you get it in the case, and will likely change the order of the steps you take to build a PC. As you might expect given this is still essentially a first-generation product, there's plenty of room for refinement.

B650M Project Zero Motherboard

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Matt Safford
Managing Editor

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • MiniITXEconomy
    Seemed like a cool idea to me, putting all those ports on the back. Then Paul from Paul's Hardware tried to convince us all otherwise, and I remember thinking, "what an out-of-touch man... he should get outta the tech game." Then just a few short months later, he did!

    But now that we know all about Paul, let's discuss this motherboard: I still think it's cool.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    with better airflow


    the few cables in a build don't effect airflow much at all...

    especially with aio.

    The concept is nice, but the main issue will always be case compat.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    I want to see a reverse PCIe x16 also at 90 degrees/or riser cable so you can actually use all the expansion slots on the front of the motherboard. Always compromising around these massive GPUs. Though that would be an even more disruptive change in case design, though there are plenty of the dual chamber chassis ready for it.
    Reply
  • edzieba
    My main gripe is that if you're going to go to all the trouble of board redesigns and needing non-standard (or at the very least a new standard) chassis to put everything in, then why half-arse things by still having a bunch of loose cables dangling around the the back that you need to plug in manually?
    If you're already having to use a bunch of custom hardware and are already selecting new component locations, then instead do what OEM PC manufacturers do: use a fixed power distribution plane, and use the self-centring-insertion variants of the Molex Mini-Fit Jr connectors that already exist. That way, the act of installing and screwing down the motherboard itself ensures the motherboard is now fully connected to the power backplane.
    You can even go one step further and integrate the front-panel header & USB headers this way, as well as fan and SATA breakouts.
    Reply
  • Notton
    edzieba said:
    My main gripe is that if you're going to go to all the trouble of board redesigns and needing non-standard (or at the very least a new standard) chassis to put everything in, then why half-arse things by still having a bunch of loose cables dangling around the the back that you need to plug in manually?
    If you're already having to use a bunch of custom hardware and are already selecting new component locations, then instead do what OEM PC manufacturers do: use a fixed power distribution plane, and use the self-centring-insertion variants of the Molex Mini-Fit Jr connectors that already exist. That way, the act of installing and screwing down the motherboard itself ensures the motherboard is now fully connected to the power backplane.
    You can even go one step further and integrate the front-panel header & USB headers this way, as well as fan and SATA breakouts.
    My guesses:
    - Extra cost
    - This new "standard" has multiple partners. It's quicker and easier to agree to where the punched out holes should go. Locking down the connectors to a specific spot is restrictive.
    - It's marketed towards DIY enthusiast segment, not OEM "shove as many out the door as fast as possible" market.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    Finally.

    Someone is thinking outside the box. This the future of PC building,
    Reply
  • user7007
    edzieba said:
    My main gripe is that if you're going to go to all the trouble of board redesigns and needing non-standard (or at the very least a new standard) chassis to put everything in, then why half-arse things by still having a bunch of loose cables dangling around the the back that you need to plug in manually?
    If you're already having to use a bunch of custom hardware and are already selecting new component locations, then instead do what OEM PC manufacturers do: use a fixed power distribution plane, and use the self-centring-insertion variants of the Molex Mini-Fit Jr connectors that already exist. That way, the act of installing and screwing down the motherboard itself ensures the motherboard is now fully connected to the power backplane.
    You can even go one step further and integrate the front-panel header & USB headers this way, as well as fan and SATA breakouts.
    Agreed, they could make it easier (not just move it all to the back) without much effort.. They also didn't use the idea that Asus is floating around of not using the big external graphics card power connectors but having essentially another pci-e1 type connector for power. That build would look substantially better with a white gpu and no gpu power cables.
    Reply
  • deesider
    user7007 said:
    Agreed, they could make it easier (not just move it all to the back) without much effort.. They also didn't use the idea that Asus is floating around of not using the big external graphics card power connectors but having essentially another pci-e1 type connector for power. That build would look substantially better with a white gpu and no gpu power cables.
    Since graphics cards are so long and overhang the motherboard they could just put the power connector on the bottom.
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    I don't care if it helps airflow or not. It's a turn on...
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    The idea is good, but they should just make a new PSU/motherboard standard with a single 100 PIN connector and have everything including GPU's powered from that.

    Should be a system where the PSU directly connects to the MB with a single 100 PIN non-wired connector. Super simply to install and never have to worry about what cables go where.
    Reply