New LED displays packing 90nm 'virus-sized' pixels can deliver 127,000 PPI visuals

Perovskite facilitates 'nano-PeLED' pixels
(Image credit: Zhejiang University)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • hotaru251
    when your pixels are THAT small...does a high defect even matter in final product as you'd never notice em right?
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Ah, 127k monitors... now imagine an Nvidia GPU to run that /sarcasm
    Reply
  • setx
    salgado18 said:
    Ah, 127k monitors... now imagine an Nvidia GPU to run that
    Oh, that's easy, but 126k of those would be fake pixels.
    Reply
  • subspruce
    salgado18 said:
    Ah, 127k monitors... now imagine an Nvidia GPU to run that /sarcasm
    that's 127K per inch, on a desktop monitor, that'd be at least 2048K
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    salgado18 said:
    Ah, 127k monitors... now imagine an Nvidia GPU to run that /sarcasm
    Can you imagine the power it would need!!
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    thisisaname said:
    Can you imagine the power it would need!!
    Can you imagine how hot the power cable's connector would be... It might even create fusion...
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    FunSurfer said:
    Can you imagine how hot the power cable's connector would be... It might even create fusion...
    Which you could then use to power it, the energy crisis is over :ROFLMAO:
    Reply
  • dalauder
    This is stupid. Visible light can't be smaller than 380 nm, for purple, and 720 nm for red. I guess you could do blue and red pixels at different sizes, but then you'd have brightness issues. Any pixel size below 1µm, or 1000nm, is therefore pretty much a gimmick.

    So sure, make stuff small. Just quit being ridiculous about it and stop when there's zero resolution difference.
    Reply
  • jp7189
    dalauder said:
    This is stupid. Visible light can't be smaller than 380 nm, for purple, and 720 nm for red. I guess you could do blue and red pixels at different sizes, but then you'd have brightness issues. Any pixel size below 1µm, or 1000nm, is therefore pretty much a gimmick.

    So sure, make stuff small. Just quit being ridiculous about it and stop when there's zero resolution difference.
    I don't think it works that way. I don't think an element that emits a photon of light has to be equal or greater than the wavelength of said light. Pretty sure a single electron can emit a photon in the visible spectrum.

    That said, I do have my doubts the technique described in this paper can make all the necessary wavelengths to make a convincing white. In fact, I have to wonder if it will be capable of anything but a single wavelength.
    Reply
  • subspruce
    jp7189 said:
    I don't think it works that way. I don't think an element that emits a photon of light has to be equal or greater than the wavelength of said light. Pretty sure a single electron can emit a photon in the visible spectrum.

    That said, I do have my doubts the technique described in this paper can make all the necessary wavelengths to make a convincing white. In fact, I have to wonder if it will be capable of anything but a single wavelength.
    also this makes zero sense, even for AR, as even the FOVEA is less dense than this.
    Reply