Apple, Samsung Control 106% of Handset Industry's Profits

33

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zak Islam
Contributor

Zak Islam is a freelance writer focusing on security, networking, and general computing. His work also appears at Digital Trends and Tom's Guide. 

  • rebturtle
    106% = Math fail
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    My thoughts exactly
    Reply
  • dthx
    Oh ... and I thought that Jean-Claude Van Damme was insane with his 1+1= 11 theory ;-)
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    dthxOh ... and I thought that Jean-Claude Van Damme was insane with his 1+1= 11 theory ;-)Then there's McDonald's 2+2=2 theory. Or was that Burger King? I forget.
    Reply
  • ronch79
    I'm not accepting the explanation that the reason why it's 106% is because of other companies' losses. 100% makes up the profits of all earnings, not counting losses, that's why we say 'earnings'. There's no way you could put other companies' losses on top of Samsung's and Apple's earnings and call it 106%.
    Reply
  • dthx
    ronch79I'm not accepting the explanation that the reason why it's 106% is because of other companies' losses. 100% makes up the profits of all earnings, not counting losses, that's why we say 'earnings'. There's no way you could put other companies' losses on top of Samsung's and Apple's earnings and call it 106%.It fits perfectly in the Apple way of presenting things:
    Processors are always 2x or 4x faster than their predecessors (so the iPad 4 must now be like 128x faster than the first one ;-) ) The new screen is 75% less reflective (how do you measure that? less reflective than what?), and so on... but there needs to be 5 iSomething articles per day on THG.


    Reply
  • murzar
    Apple, Samsung Control 106% of Handset Industry's Profits

    In the 5th dimension?
    Reply
  • ZEPd3Z
    dthxless reflective than what?A Glass mirror.
    Reply
  • this author need to stop writing all this apple stuff... and should be beaten every time time he starts doing it again
    Reply
  • diddo
    Profit - you are doing it right :)
    Reply