"Evolved" Exynos 5 Octa Soc Teased for Next Week

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • darkchazz
    No sources = No buy.... I've had it with samsung
    My next purchase will be a snapdragon device.
    Reply
  • halcyon
    11190005 said:
    No sources = No buy.... I've had it with samsung
    My next purchase will be a snapdragon device.

    There's one in every crowd.
    Reply
  • Kind of ridiculous to say not to buy something that doesn't exist. The reality in my opinion is that the current processors are more than capable until a newer generation of software will demand more raw power. The effort should really be in reducing power consumption across the board, not just from a SOC perspective. - http://www.allprepaidplans.com
    Reply
  • ojas
    EVEN THE PREVIOUS ONE USED big.LITTLE FFS WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?
    Reply
  • redeemer
    I will stick with Qualcomm
    Reply
  • deksman
    More computational power in what is essentially a pocket computer is never 'ridiculous'.
    When you consider the amount of things you can do on the go with enough power, then you would probably think differently.
    Of course, the size of the displays is a limiting factor, but then again this is consumer grade technology and nowhere near of our real technical capabilities (by contrast, this would be something out of the 'stone age' compared to what we could do by using latest science, advanced synthetic materials and state of the art methods of production).

    Anyway, I don't see the point in having two sets of 4 core cpu's in a hardware that will all of the time behave like a 4 core one.
    If its for power conservation, then simply set the cores to automatically lower the voltage and speed of the A15 chip down to the lowest possible level and have applications use specific amounts of performance/power for optimal results when needed, unless they are specifically written to take advantage of the full power of the chip (otherwise its just sloppy written program)

    Reply
  • deksman
    More computational power in what is essentially a pocket computer is never 'ridiculous'.
    When you consider the amount of things you can do on the go with enough power, then you would probably think differently.
    Of course, the size of the displays is a limiting factor, but then again this is consumer grade technology and nowhere near of our real technical capabilities (by contrast, this would be something out of the 'stone age' compared to what we could do by using latest science, advanced synthetic materials and state of the art methods of production).

    Anyway, I don't see the point in having two sets of 4 core cpu's in a hardware that will all of the time behave like a 4 core one.
    If its for power conservation, then simply set the cores to automatically lower the voltage and speed of the A15 chip down to the lowest possible level and have applications use specific amounts of performance/power for optimal results when needed, unless they are specifically written to take advantage of the full power of the chip (otherwise its just sloppy written program)

    Reply
  • somebodyspecial
    Wake me when you talk 20nm for next gen. This, if true, will only be worse than the current one without 20nm (or they'd be bragging about power usage). The only BETTER chip would be one that uses less power with the SAME perf for current gen. Until a die shrink any more power just equals shorter battery life.
    Reply
  • somebodyspecial
    Of course it goes without saying I want BIGGER batteries and not THINNER phones.
    Reply
  • halcyon
    Everyone says they want bigger batteries. I feel like as long as my phone lasts all day things aren't bad. I've not done any testing but I subjectively feel like I'm getting at least this on my 'just-average' phone. ...and since I can swap out the battery if I want all's good. So no, I don't need a 1lb brick that lasts even longer. I'm all for a better/faster/more featured experience on my handheld and tablet.
    Reply