Intel: We're Still Committed To Sockets

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer
    Don't worry, if you want a socketed processor, you can feel free to pay upwards of $500 for a Haswell-E chip. :)
    Reply
  • halcyon
    Yea. I think it would have been a mistake to leave LGA for BGA. Even when doing a lower end system I like to be able to offer our customers the ability to more power if they find they want or need it. ...and our customers often want Intel products because that's what they know.
    Reply
  • mousseng
    When they say "the foreseeable future," do they mean the one where they have 5nm processors in sight or are they just talking about next year?
    Reply
  • djscribbles
    I thought the idea of dropping sockets was rather interesting, personally. The negatives are obvious, and would have been bad, but if they still had high performance offerings it wouldn't be the end of the world.
    I don't know that I've ever upgraded my CPU without also grabbing a new mobo and usually RAM. On the flipside, troubleshooting components would be much much easier, you would have one RMA that covered mobo, cpu, and theoretically RAM. If you could buy an i5-3570k on a z77 board with 2xpcie slots and 8GB (and 2 expansion RAM slots) for 250-275$, that would be a great value and cover a huge majority of what users need. If you have problems, you need to troubleshoot the GPU, the PSU, and the mobo, and RMA one of the 3.

    I would hate to see the options we have now eliminated, but there are certainly benefits to the other approach.
    Reply
  • ojas
    Told you (all) so.
    Reply
  • husker
    The problem is cost. This would push the price higher for the enthusiast. Manufactures would have to build and stock a variety of MB/CPU combinations. They would also end up selling fewer of the socketed variety and, since this is now a "high end" feature, they will charge more for them to make up for the increased costs.
    Reply
  • Bloob
    "We won't abandon sockets while AMD is still making x86 CPUs" is what I'm getting...
    Reply
  • dark_knight33
    Why don't we go the other way with this? Maybe instead of Intel dropping LGA support for BGA, ARM can add LGA to their line up. Upgradable SOC procs for phones and tablets would be a "killer feature" IMO.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Hahahaha, God...

    For a moment I read: "We're Still Committed To Suckers" xD!

    Well, anyway, as long as AMD is around, they will.

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • esrever
    LGA 2011 replacement will still use sockets. All the other parts, who knows!
    Reply