Pioneer Offers 8x Dual-Layer Blu-ray Writer

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • bustapr
    $250 is hard to waste these days for something, although a little bit worst can be found at $150.
    Reply
  • scook9
    unless i have missed something, that price isnt high, its amazing for a drive of these characteristics.....considering that they have been at this price anyway for months...one this speed at that price is great. Hopefully it is not too loud

    just my 2 cents
    Reply
  • When you said the drive didn't come cheap, I was already imagining a $500-1000 price tag. Honestly I don't think $249.99 for a dual-layer BD is that bad. We purchased our first CD burner in 1999 for the same price back when it was fairly new. And I also remember DVD burners fetching about the same price when we were looking at them. It may be worth it to someone who wants to start archiving lots of data.

    Having said that, I'd probably wait until a price drop or two until I'd get one for myself. Since there isn't an OS that natively supports Blu-ray playback, I don't mind waiting anyway.
    Reply
  • HermDawg
    $250 is not a bad MSRP for an 8x BD-R burner. That's on par for what's out there on the streets for 8x BD burners. Plus if Pioneer says $250 it doesn't mean $250 from online retailers. I would expect the street price for this drive less than that.
    Reply
  • mavroxur
    Doesnt seem like a horrible price really. Descent specs/price point imo
    Reply
  • pug_s
    The problem is not the price of the burners, but for the disc themselves. If you want to buy a bd-r, it cost about $5 for each disc. My guess is that unless the price goes down to say about $1 per disc, there's going to be little interest in buying these discs.
    Reply
  • tacoslave
    double headers again *smacks Parrish with a newspaper roll* thats the 3rd time today.
    Reply
  • solymnar
    I was thinking the exact same thing pug.

    For the storage space it IS cheap. But a company won't use it for a backup solution until there is data showing how long the DLBR disc will reliably read, and a consumer won't likely go for it when they can just get a second and third hard drive that is likely far larger than the one they currently use for less than the cost of this drive (ignoring media price) and just backup data to the alternate hard drive/s, easier, cheaper, and quicker.

    That leaves people who want to burn HD movies. I have no clue how large that market is but I doubt its terribly large.
    Reply
  • eklipz330
    i personally am done with spinning disks and moving objects, flash is the way of the future, taking 30 mins for a disk to burn sounds to unreal for me, im thinking more like 5.

    just have games released on thumbdrives, and all shall be swell
    Reply
  • Bandwidth requirements for most things I'd put on a bluray disc and cost of bluray discs are the two reasons I can't afford one of these.

    External HDDs, HTPCs, thumbdrives, and the much lower cost of DVDs are the reasons I'll continue to live without until the above factors change.

    For me, the 250$ price tag is not a determining factor.
    Reply