UPDATE: Apple Mac Mini Based on Nvidia Ion

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • Nik_I
    this is great news. i wanted to buy a mac mini to get a taste of the mac world but i didnt wanna pay almost $700 for a really slow computer. hopefully the ion platform will also reduce the production costs.
    Reply
  • tipoo
    Wait...wouldn't moving to an atom processor be a huge step BACKWARDS in performance?


    p.s the comments are screwed up, im logged in but i still have to comment as anonymous?
    Reply
  • tipoo
    Wait...wouldn't moving to an atom processor be a huge step BACKWARDS in performance?!


    p.s the comment system is screwed up. im logged in, but down at the comment field i still have to comment as anon.
    Reply
  • Tekkamanraiden
    So a mac mini might actually not be pathetically underpowered anymore. Interesting.
    Reply
  • I just bought a mac mini with 2GHz core2duo and it's cool.

    I most certainly would NOT buy a mac mini with an Atom inside. What are Apple thinking?

    Netbook without a screen?
    Reply
  • kodamakage
    I agree with Tipoo and Dude2000, Taking the atom into the mini would be step back in performance of the system. But if they do this, then the system would/could be smaller and use less power. I personally think that its a dumb idea, but for the time being, people(at least some) seem to think that they don't want or need a full computer, and just need something like a thin client. Now, for a lot of people they really don't need a full computer. E-mail and web would be fine. But for the rest of us, we would like the mini to work well as desktop, home server, security server, etc
    Reply
  • Yeah, I don't get it. Wouldn't using an Atom CPU be a huge step down in performance from a Core 2 Duo?

    So better GPU, worse CPU?
    Reply
  • kodamakage
    Oh, and I forgot."An Nvidia partner confirmed to us that Apple was the first to receive samples of Nvidia's Ion platform," that does not mean "Confirmed: Apple Mac Mini Based on Nvidia Ion." Those are two different things. It could happen, but its not Confirmed.
    Reply
  • Roland00
    The atom 330 intel sells for $43 dollars to oem in a thousand chip shipments.
    The intel dual core e5200 soon (Jan 18, 09) will be sold for $67 dollars to oems in thousand chips shipments.

    Now the atom is a little bit cheaper, will require less power, can do a smaller case, etc but I think Mac is sacrificing too much for a mac mini by putting an atom in it at the $500 to $700 price point. Seriously for $25 more dollars Apple can have a cpu that is 3 times faster.

    ----

    Now if the new mac mini is $499 it is a different story.
    Reply
  • fancarolina
    Yea I compleatly agree the choice to switch to the Atom processor is the wrong one here. I do like seeing improved graphics out of the Mac Mini the Intel 945 sucks. I can barley output 720p video on a Mac Mini despite having the horsepower to do it. I also don't see this as a logical step in terms of 64-bit compatibility. As far as I knew the Atom chips didn't support 64-bit instructions. So what will a Mac Mini with 4gb on memory do now?
    Reply