AT&T Plans To Trial 400GbE Data Speeds In 2017

20

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • gamebrigada
    In the Title, 400GB is not 400Gb. B = Byte, b = bit. 400GB ethernet = 3200Gb. Its confusing.
    Reply
  • schm1tty
    Which is is? 400Gb or GB?
    Reply
  • James5mith
    Also, 400GB is an amount of data. You need a time element to denote speed. Like 400Gbps, or 400Gb/s.

    In technology notation matters.
    Reply
  • Tom Griffin
    Is this backbone or end to end connections?
    Reply
  • dgingeri
    Either someone is joking or misunderstanding what they're talking about. There is no way they can put out 400Gb ethernet speeds to end users. No. Possible. Way. They couldn't even do this for most business customers.

    They might be putting that to their local offices, which would give users much more usable bandwidth, where 4000 customers could maintain their 100Mb connections at full speed. That seems more like what they would be doing.
    Reply
  • jacklongley
    18793566 said:
    Is this backbone or end to end connections?

    To start with, the upgrades would occur to the backbone. They stated as much in the 3 phase summary.

    I expect that business connections won't have availability at 400Gbps until after 2017. Any availability would be sparse at best, in specific markets likely to have the demand. So probably the biggest carrier hotels first.
    Reply
  • ThisIsMe
    Sheesh... I guess Nathaniel Mott isn't going to let that AT&T/Time Warner Inc. deal go. lol
    Reply
  • Blytz
    @Dgingeri you might want to look around, 100 gigabit is already available and 400 gigabit is in dev.

    Have a google of terabit ethernet and read around.

    Unlikely it'll see copper, but it fibre, certainly
    Reply
  • Kewlx25
    An actual 400Gb connection would be quite impressive. 400Gb has been limited to trunk or peering links.
    Reply
  • somebodyspecial
    The time warner deal should definitely be killed. No way we want that much power in one place. I'd say the same if Apple, Disney etc attempts to buy netflix (rumors of both those floating around). It's bad enough they all own huge stakes in hulu.
    Reply