China Denies iPhone Ban, but the Devil Is in the Details

Apple iPhone
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

The Chinese government has clarified media reports that iPhone sales would be banned from use in government administration services. At a press conference this Wednesday, a spokesperson for China's Foreign Ministry, Mao Ning, explained that as it stands, "China did not issue any law, regulation or policy document that bans the purchase and use of cellphones of foreign brands, such as iPhone." 

But then, the original question wasn't around a hard ban on Apple products; the original report (courtesy of Wall Street Journal) referred to a soft ban on any Apple technology used at the government level. As that publication wrote, "China ordered officials at central government agencies not to use Apple's iPhones and other foreign-branded devices for work or bring them into the office." The report added that the orders were made by "superiors."

A decision like this doesn't quite have the same potency as an outright sale and usage ban (in line with the U.S. and Portugal's ban of Huawei 5G equipment from existing and future infrastructure), but they work the same way.

Yet the devil is usually in the details (especially regarding policy decisions and official communications). Specifically, Mao Ning added that while no laws had been passed banning iPhone sales, the country's concerns with security and information security (both real-world and cyber) are paramount to the government's decision. The spokesperson then added, "However, recently, we did notice media reports about security issues related to iPhone." She added, "The Chinese government attaches great importance to cyber and information security and treats Chinese and foreign companies as equals. We hope all cellphone companies operating in China will strictly abide by China's laws and regulations."

Countries can weaponize policy decisions in the global market - look at the constant back and forth between the U.S. and China. That said, it is a common occurrence that smartphones are barred from accessing specific locations or central government installations worldwide - but these rarely refer to a particular brand and are centered around smartphones' capabilities rather than doubts about a specific software or hardware implementation.

At this point, it remains to be seen what exactly comes out of this news. Countries and institutions can impact technological adoption in multiple ways without crossing any existing red tape. China being Apple's most significant market, a cultural or "authority-determined" shift away from iPhones should be a waving red flag: where would they all go? And more importantly, where would that 25% of Apple's revenue sheet come from? Just the thought that a ban had entered into effect wiped $200 billion from Apple's market valuation. China's economy also happens to be much better ranked than the US in the import/export balance sheet: while the US fell closer to a trillion deficit, China managed to unlock a new surplus record.

However, the U.S. (and Apple) would have trouble offloading their tech if (or maybe when) the Chinese market rejects some of its most significant efforts - whether through law or culture. It also pays to remember that the spokesperson's remarks around potential cybersecurity concerns open the window to a more hardline approach to Apple products within the government. 

Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • hotaru251
    not being political

    but if day ever came when China banned Iphone...could you imagine the drop in Apple stock value?
    Reply
  • anbello262
    Weren't Huawei phones kinda strongly "recommended against" in the USA/government some years ago?

    So banning specific brands doesn't sound so uncommon for me

    (I don't mean anything political, I'm just discussing the wording in the article)
    Reply
  • sauve.richard
    anbello262 said:
    Weren't Huawei phones kinda strongly "recommendwd against" in the USA/government some years ago?

    So banning specific brands doesn't sound so uncommon for me

    (I don't mean anything political, I'm just discussing the wording in the article)
    Actually Huawei and ZTE were both banned for their telecommunications equipment under the Trump era in 2018. (this is not a diatribe against Trump btw). It ended up extending to things like phones, though the details of the phone thing I don't have all the details of, so I'm not sure actual phones were banned outside of gov't personnel. But it's a good point made, well done :)
    Reply
  • bit_user
    anbello262 said:
    So banning specific brands doesn't sound so uncommon for me
    IMO, it was just a matter of time before Apple was squeezed out of the Chinese market, in one way or another. We started to see nationalist backlash against the iPhone already building, at least a couple years ago.

    The main upside I can see from these bans is that we'll hopefully no longer have US corporations kowtowing to China. If they don't make stuff there & can't sell there, then there's no more need for them to play footsie with the CCP. Over the past couple decades, I think China has mastered the art of the rope-a-dope game, knowing just how much to let foreign companies nibble at the carrot, before yanking it back.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    sauve.richard said:
    Actually Huawei and ZTE were both banned for their telecommunications equipment under the Trump era in 2018. (this is not a diatribe against Trump btw).
    The actual ban was on government communications infrastructure relying on their equipment, I think. The controversial aspect was that China was ahead in 5G tech and their gear was also cheaper. It looked anti-competitive, but it's not as if any US equipment makers were ready to fill the void on 5G, at least.

    sauve.richard said:
    It ended up extending to things like phones, though the details of the phone thing I don't have all the details of, so I'm not sure actual phones were banned outside of gov't personnel. But it's a good point made, well done :)
    The phone thing was actually not an import ban, but rather an export ban. US technologies & services were banned from being used by Huawei, which immediately hit their handset sales & support, since it included IP licensing & support by ARM and Android/Google. I think there was never an import ban on them.
    Reply
  • Geef
    Here is the reason Huawei was banned:
    US finds Huawei has backdoor access to mobile networks globallyHuawei caught red-handed: The company has backdoor access to mobile networks worldwide
    It is not just Huawei. Its ZTE and Xiaomi phones as well.
    Reply
  • MoxNix
    Geef said:
    Here is the reason Huawei was banned:
    US finds Huawei has backdoor access to mobile networks globallyHuawei caught red-handed: The company has backdoor access to mobile networks worldwide
    It is not just Huawei. Its ZTE and Xiaomi phones as well.
    And you think the US doesn't have the same access with iPhones?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    MoxNix said:
    And you think the US doesn't have the same access with iPhones?
    No, there was a famous case where the FBI tried to get a court order to force Apple to unlock a suspected terrorist's phone. Apple seems very serious about privacy and there's no legal mechanism for the US government to force a company to place backdoors in its products.
    Reply
  • Lucky_SLS
    ^ exactly that, the one company that takes privacy and security seriously and china says it has concerns.

    But we can already see Xiomi copying apple designs, it was all already in the making maybe...
    Reply
  • M0rtis
    Apple had to double down on privacy and security after the whole iCloud Celebgate or Fappening whatever it was called. Until then they were enjoying and promoting the illusion that Apple products and the ecosystem doesnt get viruses and is unhackable and so on.
    Reply